The collaborative design of environmental improvements through knowledge dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130817321Keywords:
Informal environmental education, Human-environment interactions, Urban space and environmentAbstract
Urban environmental problems are the product of the relationship between the natural environment and the city, and that action must go through the social dimension. The pursuit of sustainable development involves acquisition by the individual of the environment in which it operates, allowing an awakening to the necessary social changes. This study aimed to identify environmental awareness in children of the NGO Associação de Amigos "São Pedro Julião Eymard" (ASPE), in São Carlos-SP, and build the interface between scientific knowledge on environmental issues in the region, with the view of the participants on these issues, seeking the development of collective solutions. There were different activities over three meetings to awaken a critical eye on children on the environmental problems of their neighborhoods. With the project we found a greater sense of responsibility of children on their space, expansion of environmental awareness, and awareness of the problems and need for improvement.Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, R. Levantamento Histórico e Ocupação urbana da Unidade de Estudo. In SCHIEL, D.; MASCARENHAS, S.; VALEIRAS, N. e SANTOS, S. A. M. O estudo das bacias hidrográficas: uma estratégia para educação ambiental. São Carlos: Rima, 2002. p.37-42;
BRASIL. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. Censo 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/link.php?codmun=351950. Acesso em 12 nov. 2013;
CARVALHO, I. C. M. e GRUM, M. Hermenêutica e Educação Ambiental In FERRARO JÚNIOR, L. A. (org.) Encontros e caminhos: Formação de Educadoras(es) Ambientais e Coletivos Educadores/Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Diretoria de Educação Ambiental. Brasília: 2005. p. 175-187;
FLORIANI, D. Diálogo de Saberes: uma perspectiva socioambiental In FERRARO JÚNIOR, L. A. (org.) Encontros e caminhos: Formação de educadoras(es) Ambientais e Coletivos Educadores. Volume 2. / Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Departamento de Educação Ambiental. Brasília: 2007. p. 105-116;
SÃO CARLOS (Município). Lei n°13.944, de 12 de dezembro de 2006;
SOARES, R. G. S. Proposta de intervenção em educação ambiental no bairro: Parque Residencial Douradinho. Monografia – Curso de Especialização em Educação Ambiental – Universidade Federal de São Carlos: São Carlos, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.