Application of indicators of weakness in the system of environmental nature in watershed stream Cintra-MG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130814863Keywords:
Urban drainage, Environmental assessment, Environmental perceptionAbstract
The problems arising from unplanned urbanization are due to the lack of urban development policies, such as master plans (RIBEIRO e ROOKE, 2010). The use of indicators constitutes an instrument of great importance for proper management of public affairs. For this, the three areas (PEs) were selected in the basin, quote: east, middle course and mouth of the river, for the application of indicators of environmental fragility of nature system. The basin was identified erosion, negative interactions of drainage systems with domestic wastewater, solid waste, among others. The General Indices Fragility (IGFs) were found 57, 49 and 72 respectively to the east, middle course and river estuary, featuring high grade fragility under the environmental aspect, ranging from strong to very strong. We conclude that the use of indicators of fragility is extremely importance to public administration, particularly as a tool for identifying intervening factors and fragility of urban stormwater drainage systems.
Downloads
References
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo demográfico: sinopse – Minas Gerais, 2010.
KEMERICH, P. D. da C. et al. Avaliação da Sustentabilidade Ambiental em bacias hidrográficas mediante a aplicação do modelo P-E-R. Rev. Elet. em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental, v. 10, n. 10, 2013.
MOREIRA, A. A. et al. Análise do Comportamento Espectral de Fitofisionomias no Parque Estadual Lapa Grande por meio de dados MODIS. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, v. 6, n. 6, 2013.
MOTA, S. Gestão ambiental de recursos hídricos. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: ABES, 2008.
PORTO, R.; ZAHEL, F. K; TUCCI, C.; BIDONE, F. Drenagem Urbana. In: Hidrologia: ciência e aplicação. TUCCI, C. E. M. (org.). Porto Alegre: Ed. da Universidade, ABRH, EDUSP, 1993.
RIBEIRO, J. W.; ROOKE, J. M. S. Saneamento básico e sua relação com o meio ambiente e a saúde pública. 2010. 36 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Especialização em Análise Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora – UFJF, Juiz de Fora, 2010.
SILVA, B. J. da; PEREIRA, O. S.; ASSIS, W. A. V. de; MORAIS, L. R. S. O componente drenagem urbana no plano municipal de saneamento ambiental de Alagoinhas, Bahia. Disponível em: www.semasa.sp.gov.br/admin/biblioteca/docs/pdf/35Assemae126.pdf. Acesso em: 10 maio 2014.
SANTOS JÚNIOR, V. J. dos. Avaliação da drenagem pluvial da bacia hidrográfica do córrego Cintra em Montes Claros/MG. 2013. 84 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Engenharia Ambiental) – Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas Santo Agostinho – FACET, Montes Claros, 2013.
SILVA, B. J. da. et al. O componente drenagem urbana no plano municipal de saneamento de Alagoinhas, Bahia.2004. Disponível em: www.semasa.sp.gov.br/admin/biblioteca/docs/pdf/35Assemae126.pdf. Acesso em: 15 maio 2014.
STEINER, L. Avaliação do sistema de drenagem pluvial urbana com aplicação do índice de fragilidade. Estudo de caso: microbacia do Rio Criciúma, SC. 2011. 106 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Engenharia Ambiental) – Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense – UNESC, Criciúma, 2011.
TUCCI, C. E. M. Inundações urbanas. Porto Alegre: ABRH/RHAMA, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
