Corporate governance, dynamic capabilities and business performance in companies listed in Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão S/A (B3 S/A)
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465942441Mots-clés :
Corporate Governance, Dynamic Capabilities, Business Performance, PLS-SEMRésumé
Purpose- The main objective is to analyze the direct effect of Corporate Governance (CG) on Dynamic Capabilities (DCs) and on Business Performance (BP), and the moderating and/or mediating impact of DCs on the CG-BP relationship.
Methodology- The quantitative analysis was performed through PLS-SEM. Data were collected through a survey involving companies listed in B3 S/A from 2014 to 2016, except for companies from the financial sector. The final sample encompassed 195 companies per assessed year, thus totaling 585 observations concerning 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Findings- Confirmed the direct and positive effect of CG on DC development, as well as DC’s influence on BP and the mediating effect of DC on the CG - BP relationship. The main conclusion was that DCs are a powerful mediating influence on the CG-BP relationship. Hence, even with efficient corporate governance mechanisms, the companies must make decisions in line with their dynamic capabilities as a way to reach better business performance.
Limitations- Research cross-section method of data collection; and universe of companies listed in the Brazilian stock market.
Practical implications- For example, the rejected hypothesis about the direct effect of CG on BP and the confirmation of the indirect effect via DCs suggests the analysis of aspects related to costs with monitoring procedures applied to agency conflicts and to complementary factors that must be achieved in order to boost performance. On practical terms, the results contribute to companies that look for the best and most satisfactory performance in the markets they work in.
Téléchargements
Références
Adi, T. W., Handayani, S. R., & Rahayu, S. M. (2013). The Influence of Corporate Governance and Capital Structure on Risk, Financial Performance and Firm Value: A Study on the Mining Company Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2009-2012. European Journal of Business and Management, (29), 200-217.
Ahmed, E., & Hamdan, A. (2015). The impacto of corporate governance on firm performance: evidence from Bahrain Stock Exchange. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 3(5), 25-48.
Andrade, L. P., Salazar, G. T., Calegário, C. L. L., & Silva, S. S. (2009). Governança corporativa: uma análise da relação do conselho de administração com o valor de mercado e desempenho das empresas brasileiras. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 10(4). Doi: 10.1590/S1678- 69712009000400002
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in newproduct innovation. Journal of Marketing, v. 69, p. 61-83. Doi: 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
Barontini, R., & Bozzi, S. (2011). Board compensation and ownership structure: empirical evidence for Italian listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 15(1), p. 59-89. Doi: 10.1007/s10997-009-9118-5
Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783-827. Disponível em: <http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/2/783>. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2017.
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, Exploration, And Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. Doi: 10.1.1.486.7572
BM&FBovespa (2017). Empresas listadas. São Paulo. Disponível em: <http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/pt_br/institucional/sobre-a-bm-fbovespa/quem-somos/>. Acesso em: 28 jul. 2017.
Boone, A. L., Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 66-101. Doi: 10.1.1.217.6579
Brickley, J. A., & Zimmerman, J. L. (2010). Corporate governance myths: comments on Armstrong, Guay and Weber. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 235-245. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.002
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.
Cabral, J. E. De O., Coelho, A. F. M., Coelho, F. J. F., & Costa, M. da P. B. (2015). Capabilities, Innovation, and Overall Performance in Brazilian Export Firms. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 16(3). Doi: 10.1590/1678-69712015/administracao.v16n3p76-108
Caixe, D. F., & Krauter, E. (2013). A Influência da Estrutura de Propriedade e Controle sobre o Valor de Mercado Corporativo no Brasil. Revista de Contabilidade e Finanças - USP, 24(62), 142-153. Doi: 10.1590/S1519-70772013000200005
Caixe, D. F., & Krauter, E. (2014). The relation between corporate governance and market value: mitigating endogeneity problems. Brazilian Business Review, 11(1), 90-110. Doi: 10.15728/bbr.2014.11.1.5
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796. Doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
Catapan, A., Colauto, R. D., & Barros, C. M. E. (2003). A relação entre a governança corporativa e o desempenho econômico-financeiro de empresas de capital aberto do Brasil. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 16(2), 16-30.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (1996). A partial least squares latent variable modelling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, OH.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii–xvi.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H.P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effect of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741-2771. Doi: 10.1111/1540-6262.00511
Darosi, G. C. M. (2014). Governança Corporativa e Desempenho Financeiro nas Sociedades de Energia Elétrica Brasileira. Caderno Profissional de Administração da Caderno Profissional de Administração UNIMEP, 4(2), 29-46.
Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209-233. Doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020-7
Delgado‐García, J. B., De Quevedo‐Puente, E., & De La Fuente‐Sabaté, J. M. (2010). The impact of ownership structure on corporate reputation: Evidence from Spain. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(6), 540-556. Doi: 10.1111/J.1467-8683.2010.00818.x
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 10/11, 1105-1121.
Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: A meta‐analytic evaluation and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1348-1380. Doi: 10.1111/joms.12213
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Ferreira, R. N. (2012). Governança corporativa e desempenho: uma análise em empresas brasileiras de capital aberto. 2012. 276 f. Tese (Doutorado em Administração) – Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras.
Ferreira, R. N., Ferreira, R. Do N., Santos, A. C. Dos., Lopes, A. L. M., Nazareth, L. G. C., & Fonseca, R. A. (2013). Governança Corporativa, Eficiência, Produtividade e Desempenho. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - RAM, São Paulo, 14(4), 134-164. Doi: 10.1590/S1678-69712013000400006.
Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of management review, 25(1), 154-177.
Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113-137. Doi: 10.2307/2666981
Ghemawat, P., & Costa, J. E. I. R. (1993). The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 59-73. Doi: 10.1002/smj.4250141007
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. Doi: 10.2307/20159573
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-156. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.278920
Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597-606.
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7. ed. NJ: Prentice Hall, 2014.
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494. Doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Herrmann, J. D., Sangalli, L. C., & Teece, D. J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities: Fostering an innovation-friendly environment in Brazil. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(3), 283-287. Doi: 10.1590/s0034-759020170309
IBGC. Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa (2015). Código das melhores práticas de governança corporativa. 5. ed. São Paulo: IBGC. Disponível em: <http://www.ibgc.org.br/userfiles/2014/files/codigoMP_5edicao_web.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2016.
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. Doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. Doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2002). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(5), 703-728.
Kock, N. (2015). WarpPLS 5.0 user manual. Laredo, TX: ScriptWarp Systems.
Kyriakopoulos, K., & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219-240. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.001
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. The Journal of Finance, 57, 1147-70. Doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00457
Leal, R. P. C., Carvalhal, A. L., & Ievorlino, A. P. (2015). One decade of evolution of corporate governance practices in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 13(1), 134-161. Doi: 0.2139/ssrn.2611372
Leal, R. P. C., & Saito, R. (2003). Finanças Corporativas no Brasil. RAE Eletrônica, 2 (2), 1–15.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112.
Lisboa, A., Skarmeas, D., & Lages, C. (2013). Export market exploitation and exploration and performance: Linear, moderated, complementary and non-linear effects. International Marketing Review, 30(3), 211-230. Doi: 10.1108/02651331311321972.
Liu, H. Y., & Hsu, C. W. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of corporate diversification: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Management Decision, 49(9), 1510-1534. Doi: 10.1108/00251741111173961
Love, I. (2011). Corporate performance around the world: what we know and what we don’t. World Bank Research Observer, 26(1), 42-70. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp030>. Acesso em: 5 de nov. 2016.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672. Doi: 10.1177/0149206306290712
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Meirelles, D. S., & Bueno Camargo, Á. A. (2014). Capacidades dinâmicas: o que são e como identificá-las?. RAC-Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18 (Ed. Esp.), 41-64. Doi: 10.1590/1982-7849rac20141289
Melo, R. S., Batista, P. C. de S., de Macedo, A. C. M., & de Costa, R. B. L. (2013). A contribuição da governança corporativa para o desempenho das empresas brasileiras de capital aberto. Revista de Gestão - REGE, 20(1), 79-92. Doi: 10.5700/issn.2177-8736.rege.2013.62001
Monks, R. A. G., Minow, N. (2004). Corporate governance. 3. ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nascimento, J. C. H. B., & da Silva Macedo, M. A. (2016). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais com Mínimos Quadrados Parciais: um Exemplo daAplicação do SmartPLS® em Pesquisas em Contabilidade. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade - REPEC, 10(3). Doi: 10.17524/repec.v10i3.1376
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. Doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
O”Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future (Research Paper No. 2130). Stanford Research Paper Series.
O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California management review, 53(4), 5-22. Doi: 10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
OECD (2004). Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. Principles of corporate governance. Paris. Disponível em: <http://www.oecd.org/>. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2016.
Oman, C. P. (2001). Corporate governance and national development. OECD Publishing.
Paes de Paula, A. P. (2016). Para além dos paradigmas nos Estudos Organizacionais: o Círculo das Matrizes Epistêmicas. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 14, 26-46. Doi: 10.1590/1679-395131419
Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 79-91.
Rogers, P., & Ribeiro, K. C. de S. (2006). Mecanismos de Governança Corporativa no Brasil: evidências do controle pelo mercado de capitais. Contextus–Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 4(2). Doi: 10.19094/contextus.v4i2.32076
Rossetti, J. P., & Andrade, A. (2011). Governança corporativa: fundamentos, desenvolvimento e tendências. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Rossoni, L., & Machado-da-Silva, C. (2013). Legitimidade, governança corporativa e desempenho: análise das empresas da BM&FBovespa. Revista de Administração de Empresas, São Paulo, 53(3), 272-289. Doi: 10.1590/S0034-75902013000300005
Saito, R., & Silveira, A. D. M. da. (2008). Governança corporativa: custos de agência e estrutura de propriedade. Revista de Administração de Empresas - RAE, 48(2). Doi: 10.1590/S0034-75902008000200007
Sethi, R., & Sethi, A. (2009). Can quality‐oriented firms develop innovative new products? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 206-221. Doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00346.x
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. Doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.
Silva, A. L. (2002). A influência da estrutura de controle e propriedade no valor de mercado, estrutura de capital e política de dividendos das empresas brasileiras de capital aberto. Tese (Doutorado em Administração) – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
Silva, A. L. C., & Leal, R. P. C. (2007). Governança Corporativa: evidências empíricas no Brasil. São Paulo: Atlas.
Silva, R. L. M.; Nardi, P. C. C., & Pimenta Júnior, T. O impacto da migração das empresas para os níveis diferenciados de governança corporativa da BM&F BOVESPA sobre o risco e o retorno de suas ações. Revista de Administração da UFSM, v. 5, n. 2, p. 222-242, 2012. DOI: 10.5902/198346592599
Silva, E. C. (2012). Governança Corporativa nas empresas: guia prático de orientação para acionistas, investidores, conselheiros de administração e fiscal, executivos, gestores, analistas de mercado e pesquisadores. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Silveira, A. D. M.; Barros, L. A. B. C., & Famá, R. (2008). Atributos corporativos e concentração acionária no Brasil. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 48(2), 51-66. Doi: 10.1590/S0034-75902008000200005
Silveira, A. M. (2002). Governança corporativa, desempenho e valor da empresa no Brasil. (Dissertação de Mestrado) – Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
______ (2005). Governança Corporativa: desempenho e valor da empesa no Brasil. São Paulo: Saint Paul Editora.
Škare, M., & Hasić, T. (2016). Corporate governance, firm performance, and economic growth–theoretical analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 35-51. Doi: 10.3846/16111699.2015.1071278.
Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 259-276. Doi: 10.1002/smj.450
Staub, I. D., Martins, H. C., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2008). Governança corporativa e criação de valor para o acionista: da teoria à prática, os impactos organizacionais e financeiros. Revista Economia & Gestão, 2(3).
Sutton, J. (2002). Rich trades, scarce capabilities: industrial development revisited. Economic and Social Review, 33(1), 1-22.
Tao, N. B., & Hutchinson, M. (2013). Corporate governance and risk management: The role of risk management and compensation committees. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 9(1), 83-99. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2013.03.003
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. Doi: 10.1002/smj.640
______ (2009). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. New York: Oxford University Press.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. Doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Teh, C. C. (2014). A influência das tensões ambidestras na arquitetura organizacional para inovação: estudo de casos em empresas brasileiras da indústria de transformação. 2014. 242f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção) – Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo
Tushman, M. L., & O’reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Managing Innovation and Change.
Vieira, S. P., & Mendes, A. G. S. T. (2006). Governança corporativa: uma análise de sua evolução e impactos no mercado de capitais brasileiro. Organizações em Contexto, 2(3), 48-67.
Wanyama, D., & Olweny, T. (2013). Effects of corporate governance on financial performance of listed insurance firms in Kenya. Public Policy and Administration Research, 3(4), 96-120.
Wei, Z., Zhao, J., & Zhang, C. (2014). Organizational ambidexterity, market orientation, and firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33, 134-153. Doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.06.001
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
Wheeler, B. C. (2002). NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 125-146. Doi: 10.1287/isre.13.2.125.89
Wu, L. Y. (2006). Resources, dynamic capabilities and performance in a dynamic environment: perceptions in Taiwanese IT enterprises. Information & Management, 43(4), 447-454. Doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.11.001
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. Doi: 10.2307/4134351
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Revista de Administração da UFSM 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.