Beyond what the eyes can see: art as a way of connecting actors and promoting social innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465972398Palabras clave:
Social innovation, Quintuple Helix, Collaboration, Entrepreneurial ecosystem, Action researchResumen
Purpose: This paper aims to understand the relationship between actors' roles in an entrepreneurial ecosystem from the perspective of Quintuple Helix to promote Social Innovation.
Methodology: Participatory action research was carried out during the planning and execution of a project involving University, industry, government, and different actors of society inserted in an entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Findings: The data were analyzed following Kemmis and Mctaggart (2007): plan, act and observe, and reflect. Based on the Helix concept, the case is characterized as an entrepreneurial ecosystem with the interaction between a group of actors. The results reinforce the importance of collaboration in the process of social innovation and understanding the role of each actor.
Practical implications: The results can help public, private, and non-profit organizations identify their actions, reflect on potential partnerships, and design initiatives capable of generating Social Innovation.
Social implications: Training of artists to be creators of prints, facilitating their insertion in the job market; integration between students and civil society association; connection between footwear industry and civil society association by the donation of pairs of sneakers for children.
Originality/value: This research can help public, private, and non-profit organizations to identify their actions, reflect on potential partnerships, and design initiatives capable of generating social innovation. We emphasize the importance of engagement, collaboration, and value creation for those involved in social innovation processes.
Descargas
Citas
Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2018). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: An ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501–514. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9
Adner, R., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (2013). Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems (Vol. 30). Bingley, England: Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-3322(2013)0000030018
Agostini, M. R., Morás, C., D’Agostini, M., & Carra, L. V. A. (2020). An overview of the theme of social innovation in the three sectors: a research in the studies of the gaucho universities. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 13, 1571–1590. Retrieved from https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reaufsm/article/view/44270. doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465944270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465944270
Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
Andion, C., Ronconi, L., Moraes, R. L., Gonsalves, A. K. R., & Serafim, L. B. D. (2017). Sociedade civil e inovação social na esfera pública: uma perspectiva pragmatista. Revista de Administração Pública, 51(3), 369-387. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.br/j/rap/a/sM48Ppm4gsfY3DkswsMJp6N/. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612143195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612143195
André, I., & Abreu, A. (2006). Dimensões e espaços da inovação social. Finisterra, 41(81). Retrieved from https://revistas.rcaap.pt/finisterra/article/view/1465. doi: https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis1465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis1465
Audretsch, D. B., Eichler, G. M., & Schwarz, E. J. (2022). Emerging needs of social innovators and social innovation ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18, 217–254. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11365-021-00789-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00789-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00789-9
Barbosa, F. V., Coelho, C. N., Vieira, L. M., Araújo, P. M., Torga, E. M. M. F., & Medeiros, R. (2019). Inovação social e empreendedorismo: O caso do Projeto Incluir. Anais do XLIII Encontro da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2019, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 43. Retrieved from https://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/56323
Barki, E., Comini, G., Cunliffe, A., Hart, S., & Rai, S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social business: Retrospective and prospective research. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(4), 380-384. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.br/j/rae/a/N4kzrjj9jdkxNhjWWVxvJbJ/. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150402
Benneworth, P., & Cunha, J. (2015). Universities’ contributions to social innovation: reflections in theory & practice. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4), 508-527. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJIM-10-2013-0099/full/html. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2013-0099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2013-0099
Bignetti, L. P. (2011). As inovações sociais: uma incursão por ideias, tendências e focos de pesquisa. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, 47(1), 3-14. Retrieved from https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/ciencias_sociais/article/view/1040. doi: https://doi.org/10.4013/1040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4013/csu.2011.47.1.01
Bittencourt, B. A., & Figueiró, P. S. (2020). Innovation ecosystems articulation and shared value creation. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17(4), 1002-1015. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.br/j/cebape/a/DbYmxGh5SXdNnhyY4YRcmSK/?lang=en. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174403x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174403x
Bonfim, G., Parisotto, I. R. S. dos, & Miranda, R. L de. (2019). Os estágios do empreendedorismo social no Projeto Gastromotiva. Anais do VIII Encontro de Administração Pública da ANPAD – EnAPG, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil, 8. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/23c4/40bf8243d4b195fedb2795d4a5760bbe767e.pdf
Bozhikin, I., Macke, J., & Costa, L. F. da (2019). The role of government and key non-state actors in social entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 730– 747. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619311540?via%3Dihub. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.076
Brandão, C. R. (1984). Repensando a Pesquisa Participante. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.
Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162513001236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273268696_Triple_Helix_Quadruple_Helix_and_Quintuple_Helix_and_How_Do_Knowledge_Innovation_and_the_Environment_Relate_To_Each_Other. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Stamati, D., & Valvi, T. (2019). Social business model innovation: A quadruple/quintuple helix-based social innovation ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(1), 235-248. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8720229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2914408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2914408
Cloitre, A., Paulino, V. S. dos, & Theodoraki, C. (2022), The quadruple/quintuple helix model in entrepreneurial ecosystems: an institutional perspective on the space case study. R&D Management, 53(4), 675-694. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12547. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12547
Cloutier, J. (2003). Qu'est-ce que l'innovation sociale? Montréal: Crises.
Comini, G. M., Fischer, R. M., & D'amario, E. Q. (2022). Social business and social innovation: the Brazilian experience. Innovation & Management Review, 19(2), 140-155. Retrieved from https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/197011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-06-2020-0081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-06-2020-0081
Correia, S. É. N., Oliveira, V., & Gomez, C. R. P. (2016). Dimensions of social innovation and the roles of organizational actor: the proposition of a framework. RAM, Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 102-133. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.br/j/ram/a/HwLymtzCxtW7wQshNGxrMFg/abstract/?lang=en. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p102-133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p102-133
Cruz, T. S. da, Gomes, S. S. M., Figueiredo, P. S., Sampaio, M. S., Dias, J. M., Fº, & Ferreiro, J. V., Neto (2020). Factors Influencing the Attitudes of Individuals in Favor of Sustainable Development: A Study with Students in the Field of Management. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 13, 1133-1153. Retrieved from https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reaufsm/article/view/42707. doi: 10.5902/ 19834659 42707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465942707
Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2012). The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization science, 23(4), 988-1007. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23252445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0673
Silva, M. de, & Wright, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial co‐creation: societal impact through open innovation. R&D Management, 49(3), 318-342. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12362
Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18-29. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516307867. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028
Domanski, D., Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., (2019). A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 454-474. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397
Duchek, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial resilience: A biographical analysis of successful entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 429–455. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11365-017-0467-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0467-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0467-2
Eichler, G., & Schwarz, E. (2019). What Sustainable Development Goals Do Social Innovations Address? A Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Social Innovation Literature. Sustainability, 11(2), 522. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/522. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020522
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733399000554. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Fulgencio, H., & Fever, H. L. (2016). What is the social innovation system? A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2(10), 434-452. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286012958_What_is_the_social_innovation_system_A_state-of-the-art_review. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2016.074837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2016.074837
Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., & Schröder, A. (2017). Social entrepreneurs: Important actors within an ecosystem of social innovation. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 1(2). Retrieved from https://pub.sinnergiak.org/esir/article/view/43. doi: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.16-2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.16-2.4
Isenberg, D. J. (2016). Applying the Ecosystem Metaphor to Entrepreneurship: Uses and Abuses. The Antitrust Bulletin, 61(4), 564–573. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003603X16676162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X16676162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X16676162
Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard business review, 88(6), 40-50.
Kemmis, S.m & Mctaggart. (2007). Participatory Action Research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln. Handbook of qualitative research (3rd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A., & Archer, T. (2004). Harnessing the creative potential among users. Journal of product innovation management, 21(1), 4-14. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00050.x. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00050.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00050.x
Lamine, W., Anderson, A., Jack, S. L., & Fayolle, A. (2021) Entrepreneurial space and the freedom for entre-preneurship: institutional settings, policy, and action in the space industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(2), 309–340. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sej.1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1392
Lazzeretti, L., & Capone, F. (2020). The role of education in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: the case of'Made in Italy Tuscany Academy'in the Florence fashion city. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 40(2), 270-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2020.107753
Müller, L., Silva, T. L. da, & Ribeiro, L. A. (2020). Sustainable community development - applicability and global contextualization of urban indicators. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 13, 1441–1458. Retrieved from https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reaufsm/article/view/45233. doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465945233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465945233
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: The Young Foundation.
Ndou, V., & Schiuma, G. (2020). The role of social innovation for a knowledge-based local development: insights from the literature review. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 11(1), 6-25. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijkbde/v11y2020i1p6-25.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2020.10028477
Petrovskaya, I., & Mirakyan, A. (2017). A mission of service: social entrepreneur as a servant leader. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(3), 755-767. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2016-0057/full/html. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-02-2016-0057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2016-0057
Rao-Nicholson, R., Vorley, T., & Khan, Z. (2017). Social innovation in emerging economies: A national systems of innovation-based approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 228–237. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517303359?via%3Dihub. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.013
Ratinho, T., Amezcua, A., Honig, B., & Zeng, Z. (2020). Supporting entrepreneurs: A systematic review of literature and an agenda for research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162518311399?via%3Dihub. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119956
Repo, P., & Matschoss, K. (2020). Social innovation for sustainability challenges. Sustainability, 12(1), 319. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/319. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010319
Rodrigues, M. D. C. A., Nogueira, C., & Pinto, H. (2023). Inovações sociais para a utilização sustentável da água. Experiências de pequena escala em Lajedo de Timbaúba (Brasil) e Tamera (Portugal). Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, 55-73. Retrieved from https://estudogeral.uc.pt/handle/10316/107289. doi: https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.28095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.28095
Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., Dorado-Mayorga, E., Pereira-Álvarez, G. A., Osorio-Atehortúa, U., Malavera-Pineda, S. M., & Montoya-Quintero, J. A. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship and new business models: A market research in Colombia. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 13(4), 875-894. Retrieved from https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reaufsm/article/view/55278. doi: 10.5902/1983465955278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465955278
Scuotto, A., Cicellin, M., & Consiglio, S. (2023). Social bricolage and business model innovation: a framework for social entrepreneurship organizations. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(2), 234-267. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JSBED-02-2022-0094/full/html#abstract DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2022-0094
Sebrae. (2021). Mapeamento de Startups Digitais do Rio Grande do Sul 2016. Brasília: Sebrae. Retrieved from https://www.sebraers.com.br/images/pdf/MAPEAMENTO%20-%20STARTUPS%20-%20RS%20-%20COMPLETO.pdf
Segatto, A. P., Silva, R. L. M., & Justen, G. S. (2019). Configuração de parcerias em inovação social nos contextos brasileiro e britânico. Anais do XLIII Encontro da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2019, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 43. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336283993_Configuracao_de_Parcerias_em_Inovacao_Social_nos_Contextos_Brasileiro_e_Britanico
Sheik, A., Rooyen, D. van, & Mazzei, M. (2022). Social innovation in South Africa: building inclusive economies? Social Enterprise Journal, 19(1), 1-22. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SEJ-07-2021-0060/full/html. doi: 10.1108/SEJ-07-2021-0060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-07-2021-0060
Simatupang, T. M., Schwab, A., & Lantu, D. (2015). Introduction: Building sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26(4), 389-398. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323905829_Building_Sustainable_Entrepreneurship_Ecosystems. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161598
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 41(1), 49-72. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/etap.12167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
Stam, E., & Ven, A. van de. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 809–832. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6#citeas. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
Surie, G., & Groen, A. (2017). The importance of social entrepreneurship in national systems of innovation — An introduction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 181–183. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517306170. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.010
Thiollent, M. (2003). Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. São Paulo: Cortez editora.
Thomas, L. D. W., & Ritala, P. (2021). Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: a collective action view. Journal of Management, 48(3), 515–541. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0149206320986617 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320986617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320986617
Thomaz, I. F., & Catalão-Lopes, M. (2019). Improving the Mentoring Process for Social Entrepreneurship in Portugal: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(3), 367–379. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420676.2018.1561497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1561497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1561497
Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96–116. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sej.1285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1285
Toivonen, T. (2016). What is the social innovation community? Conceptualizing an emergent collaborative organization. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 49-73. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420676.2014.997779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.997779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.997779
Torlig, E. G. D. S., & Resende, P. C., Jr. (2019). Framework de Inovação Social em uma Abordagem Integrativa: Dos Desafios Sociais aos Resultados em uma Perspectiva Universidade-Governo-Comunidade. Anais do XLIII Encontro da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2019, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 43.
Universidade Feevale (2022). Feevale Techpark: inovação, desenvolvimento tecnológico e empreendedorismo. Retrieved from https://feevaletechpark.com.br/sobre-o-parque-tecnologico/
Hippel, E. von. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wirth, S., Tschumi, P., Mayer, H., & Tanner, M. B. (2023). Change agency in social innovation: an analysis of activities in social innovation processes. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 10(1), 33-51. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21681376.2022.2157324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2157324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2157324
Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 479-500. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0266242613519807. doi: 10.1177/0266242613519807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613519807
Zarelli, P. R., Carvalho, A. P., Kock, M. L. (2019). Inovação social: Análise em habitats de inovação. Anais do XLIII Encontro da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2019, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 43.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Administração da UFSM
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor y licencias: esta revista sigue siendo el titular de los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados. Para ser publicado, los autores deben firmar la Carta de transferencia de derechos de autor, que se envía a los autores por correo electrónico, otorgando derechos, incluida la traducción, a ReA / UFSM. La revista otorga a terceros el derecho a usar, reproducir y compartir el artículo de acuerdo con el acuerdo de licencia Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), como se indica en los documentos PDF de los artículos.
