Dark personality traits and the use of sources of guidance at work: a comparison between the United States and Brazil

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465965100

Palabras clave:

Sources of guidance, Dark personality traits, Organizational behavior, Cross-cultural research

Resumen

Purpose: The objective of this research was to statistically test significant correlations between dark personality traits and employee’s use of sources of guidance when dealing with different events at work, comparing the United States and Brazil.

Methodology: 220 employees from a Brazilian university and 166 employees from an American university filled out a paper-and-pencil questionnaire comprised of two previously-validated scales. Based on the theoretical review about the constructs, 10 hypotheses were raised to be empirically tested through Pearson correlation (r) tests.

Findings: The dark personality trait Machiavellianism was positively correlated with the use of Informal Rules and negatively correlated with the use of Formal Rules and Procedures as a guidance source at work in the American sample. In addition, the dark personality trait Psychopathy was negatively correlated with the use of Formal Rules and Procedures as a guidance source at work in the Brazilian sample.

Practical implications: The findings have implications for administrators and human resource professionals, who can benefit from knowledge about correlations between dark personality traits and employee’s attitude of relying on sources of guidance at work, especially when it comes to recruiting and selecting processes.

Limitations: Although the research was restricted to correlations, it elaborated a robust ground for causality investigations.

Originality: The investigation involved two countries with a cross-cultural approach. In an international and multicultural scenario, it becomes strategic to deeper investigate specificities of work-related constructs in different nations, aiming at effective and contextualized management practices.

Descargas

Biografía del autor/a

André Luiz Mendes Athayde, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG).

Doutor em Administração pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB) com Estágio Doutoral na University of Tampa (UT), em Tampa-FL, Estados Unidos (Bolsista Capes - PDSE); Mestre em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV); Graduado em Administração pelo Instituto Educacional Santo Agostinho (FASA); Graduado em Letras Inglês pela Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (Unimontes); Formação complementar em Inglês Avançado na Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) em Nashville-TN, Estados Unidos. Formação complementar em Supply Chain Management na NN/AS em Copenhagen, Dinamarca. Já apresentou trabalhos científicos na Universidade de Oxford, Inglaterra (St Annes College - University of Oxford) e na Facultad de Ciencias Sociales da Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica. Possui trabalho científico publicado pela Academy of Management (AoM) e já recebeu prêmio de melhor artigo da área de Estudos Organizacionais em evento nacional promovido pela Universidade de São Paulo (SemeAd - USP) . Atuou como Coordenador de Transportes e Exportação em indústria multinacional; Atuou como Coordenador de Planejamento e Infraestrutura da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Atuou como Coordenador do Tema Educação Superior e Internacionalização da Divisão EnEPQ/ANPAD em evento científico. Atualmente, é Professor Adjunto do Magistério Superior lotado na Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) - Campus Montes Claros; Subcoordenador do Curso de Administração; Membro do Comitê de Coordenação do Centro de Estudos Latino-Americanos, vinculado à Diretoria de Relações Internacionais (DRI/UFMG); Membro da Associação Internacional de Psicologia Transcultural (IACCP); Coordenador do Grupo de Estudos em Administração (GEA/ICA/UFMG) e Membro do Núcleo Docente Estruturante (NDE) do Curso de Administração da referida Universidade.

Claudio Vaz Torres, University of Brasília (UnB).

Possui graduação em Psicologia pela Universidade de Brasília (1988), mestrado em Psicologia pela Universidade de Brasília (1991) e Ph.D. em Industrial Organizational Psychology - California School of Professional Psychology (1999), pós-doutorado em Marketing pela Griffith University, Austrália (2004), pós-doutorado em Cross-cultural Research pela University of Sussex, Inglaterra (2009), pós-doutorado em Cross-cultural Psychology and Human Values pela Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel (2013) e pós-doutorado em Basic Human Values na University of Haifa (2018). Em todos estágios pós-doutorais, desenvolveu e validou para amostras brasileiras medidas para uso em pesquisa transcultural, notadamente o Questionário Refinado de Valores - PVQ-RR. Atualmente é revisor do JCCP - Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology; IJIR - International Journal of Intercultural Research; American Psychologist Journal; Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea; e RAM - Revista de Administração da Mackenzie. Avaliador de trabalhos da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração. É filiado à Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Psicologia, na qual coordena um Grupo de Trabalho em Psicologia e Segurança Pública. Membro da International Association for Cross Cultural Psychology, da qual também é o Representante Regional para a América do Sul. Parte das atribuições desta representação inclui a aplicação, para o contexto nacional, de pesquisas transculturais a carências e problemas sociais da América do Sul.

Stephanie Jeanne Thomason, University of Tampa (UT) - USA.

Ph.D. Business Administration, International Business and Human Resource Management, Florida Atlantic University, USA, 2007.

MBA Business Administration, Florida Atlantic University, USA, 1999.

B.S. Business Management, Florida State University, USA, 1989.

Professor at University of Tampa (UT), USA. Department of Administration.

Citas

Athayde, A. L. M., & Torres, C. V. (2020). Guidance sources at work: Let’s look inside us? International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Science Studies – IJISSS, 6(1), 14-22.

Athayde, A. L. M., Santos, C. L. T., Fiuza, G. D., & Costa, A. C. R. (2019). Gestão Internacional de Pessoas: Novas Possibilidades de Pesquisa. Revista Pretexto, 20(2), 67-86.

Athayde, A. L. M., & Silva, L. S. O. (2019). Gestão Internacional de Pessoas: Uma análise bibliométrica da produção científica em periódicos brasileiros, 2000-2017. Revista de Carreiras & Pessoas – ReCaPe, 9(3), 414-442.

Bergman, S. M., Fearrington, M. E., Davenport, S. W., & Bergman, J. Z. (2011). Millennials, narcissism, and social networking: What narcissists do on social networking sites and why. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 706-711.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

Field, A. (2009). Descobrindo a Estatística usando o SPSS. Porto Alegre, Brazil, Artmed.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26.

Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420-432.

Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8(2), 111-120.

Jonason, P. K., Webster, G. D., Schmitt, D. P., Li, N. P., & Crysel, L. (2012). The antihero in popular culture: Life History Theory and the Dark Triad personality traits. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 192-199.

Jonason, P. K., & Middleton, J. P. (2015). Dark Triad: The “dark side” of human personality. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 671-675). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary, & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (Vol. 1, Chap. 7, pp. 93-108). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Judge, T. A., Klinger, R., Simon, L. S., & Yang, I. W. F. (2008). The contributions of personality to organizational behavior and psychology: findings, criticisms, and future research directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1982-200.

Kircaburun, K., Sural, I., March, E., Balta, S., Emirtekin, E., & Griffiths, M. D. (2021). Study addiction and ‘dark’ personality traits: a cross-sectional survey among emerging adults. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 39(3), 307-315.

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2014). The Dark Triad, the Big Five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 2-5.

Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory Revised: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., & Smith, S. F. (2015). Successful psychopathy: A scientific status report. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 298-303.

Mathieu, C. (2021). Dark Personalities in the Workplace. Academic Press, United States.

Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2001). Applying regression and correlation. London, UK: Sage Publications.

O’Boyle, E., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G., & McDaniel, M. A. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of the Dark Triad and Work Behavior: A Social Exchange Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557-579.

Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopatholy, 21(3), 913-938.

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

Peterson, M. F. (1987). Managing organizational events in real state sales offices (Unpublished manuscript). Texas Tech University, College of Business Administration, Lubbock, TX.

Peterson, M. F., Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H., & Misumi, J. (1990). Personal Reliance on Event-Management Processes in Four Countries, Group & Organization Studies, 15(1), 75-91.

Peterson, M. F., & Smith, P. B. (2000). Meanings, organization, and culture: Using sources of meaning to make sense of organizational events. In N. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderon, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 101-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Peterson, M. F., et al. (2010). Social Structures and Personal Values that Predict E-mail Use: An International Comparative Structure. Journal of Global Information Management, 18(2), 57-84.

Peterson, M. F., Barreto, T. S., & Smith, P. B. (2016). Revised sources of guidance measures: Six events and demographic controls. In Roland-Lévy, C., Denoux, P., Voyer, B., Boski, P., Gabrenya Ju, & W. K. (Eds.), Unity, diversity, and culture: Research and Scholarship Selected from the 22nd Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 213-217). Melbourne, FL: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.

Rauthman, J. F. (2013). Investigating the MACH-IV with Item Response Theory and proposing the Trimmed MACH*. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(4), 388-397.

Salessi, S., & Omar, A. (2018). Psychometric properties of a scale to measure the dark side of personality. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(2), 159-170.

Sheridan, J. E., Vredenburgh, D. J., & Abelson, M. A. (1984). Contextual model of leadership influence in hospital units. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 57-78.

Silva, N. B., Orsi, A., & Nakata, L. E. (2013). Análise da Produção Acadêmica sobre Gestão Internacional de Recursos Humanos entre 2001 e 2011. Revista de Carreiras & Pessoas - ReCaPe, 3(3), 50-60.

Smith, P. B. & Peterson, M. F. (1988). Leadership, organizations and culture: An event management model. Sage, London, UK.

Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). Cultural Values, Sources of Guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior: a 47-Nation Study, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2), 188-208.

Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., Thomason, S. J., & Event Meaning Management Research Group (2011). National Culture as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Manager’s Use of Guidance Sources, and How Well Work Events are Handled. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 1101-1121.

Szabó, Z. P., Simon, E., Czibor, A., Restás, P., & Bereczkei, T. (2021). The importance of dark personality traits in predicting workplace outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 183, 1-6.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

Wetzel, E., & Robins, R. W. (2016). Are parenting practices associated with the development of narcissism? Findings from a longitudinal study of Mexican-origin youth. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 84-94.

Zeigler-Hill, V., & Marcus, D. K. (2016). A bright future for dark personality features? In V. Zeigler-Hill & D. K. Marcus (Eds.). The Dark Side of Personality: Science and Practice in Social, Personality, and Clinical Psychology (Vol.1, Chap. 1, pp. 3-22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Descargas

Publicado

2022-07-20

Cómo citar

Athayde, A. L. M., Torres, C. V., & Thomason, S. J. (2022). Dark personality traits and the use of sources of guidance at work: a comparison between the United States and Brazil. Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 15(2), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465965100

Número

Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2022): Apr-Jun

Sección

Articles

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Administração da UFSM

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Derechos de autor y licencias: esta revista sigue siendo el titular de los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados. Para ser publicado, los autores deben firmar la Carta de transferencia de derechos de autor, que se envía a los autores por correo electrónico, otorgando derechos, incluida la traducción, a ReA / UFSM. La revista otorga a terceros el derecho a usar, reproducir y compartir el artículo de acuerdo con el acuerdo de licencia Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), como se indica en los documentos PDF de los artículos.