Mechanism of change towards the Circular Economy: a case study in the packaging sector under the lens of Institutional Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465974072Schlagworte:
Institutional Theory, Reverse logistics, Circular Economy, SustainabilityAbstract
Purpose – This article aims to analyze normative isomorphism as a mechanism for institutional change and its potential contribution to the institutionalization of the Circular Economy in the packaging market in Brazil.
Methodology – A qualitative approach through in-depth interviews with a semi-structured script. 23 people from the First sector – government, 15 people from the Second sector – market, and 15 people from the Third sector – Non-Governmental Organizations were interviewed. The snowball sampling technique was used to select the interviewees. The content analysis was conducted with categories defined while exploring the data collected, a posteriori, with NVivo software.
Findings – In Brazil, the pressure for socio-environmental product improvements is concentrated on a portion of the population. Most people focus on economic issues. In addition, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and supervisory government agencies play a crucial role in directly demanding that laws are complied with and in encouraging and instructing civil society related to the Circular Economy and sustainability.
Research implications – this article contributes to filling gaps identified in the literature, such as Circular Economy studies that investigate the dynamics of stakeholders.
Practical implications – the research shows that there is room for organizations that operate in the packaging market in Brazil to develop and disseminate actions related to the Circular Economy and sustainability to their consumers, which can become a competitive advantage in the sector.
Originality/value – the research pointed out that the perception of those involved in this supply chain is still not unanimous regarding society's demand for a circular economy and sustainable actions.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Abrampa (2020). Associação Brasileira dos Membros do Ministério Público de Meio Ambiente. Nota Técnica da ABRAMPA: Sobre a proposta de Termo de Compromisso de grupo de empresas a ser celebrado com a União para fomento à Economia Circular e Logística Reversa de Embalagens em Geral.
Abuabara, L., Paucar-Caceres, A., & Burrowes-Cromwell, T. (2019). Consumers’ values and behaviour in the Brazilian coffee-in-capsules market: promoting circular economy. International Journal of Production Research, 57(23), 7269–7288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1629664
Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Yin, F., & Dou, Y. (2020). Sustainable supply chain flexibility and its relationship to circular economy-target performance. International Journal of Production Research, 58(19), 5893-5910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1661532
Barbalho, F. A., & Medeiros, J. J. (2014). Transparência e legitimação de objetivos institucionais em empresas estatais: um estudo de caso sobre a Petrobras. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 12(1), 469-493. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-39519107
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70.
Besharov, M. L., & Khurana, R. (2012). Leading amidst competing technical and institutional demands: Revisiting selznick’s conception of leadership. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 44(1), 53-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20150000044004
Bressanelli, G., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2019). Challenges in supply chain redesign for the Circular Economy: a literature review and a multiple case study. International Journal of Production Research, 57(23), 7395–7422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1542176
Carter, C., & Easton, P. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111101420
Cerqueira-Streit, J. A., Endo, G. Y., Guarnieri, P., & Batista, L. (2021). Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Route for a Circular Economy : An Integrative Literature Review. Logistics, 5(81), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040081
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited : Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
EMF, Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy. (2013). Vol. 1: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen Macarthur Foundation, 1(1), 1-96. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545321
Fung, Y. N., Choi, T. M., & Liu, R. (2019). Sustainable planning strategies in supply chain systems: proposal and applications with a real case study in fashion. Production Planning and Control, 31(12), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1695913
Fuss, M., Barros, R. T. V., & Poganietz, W. R. (2021). The role of a socio-integrated recycling system in implementing a circular economy – The case of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Waste Management, 121(1), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.006
Genovese, A., Acquaye, A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66(1), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Greer, R., Von Wirth, T., & Loorbach, D. (2021). The Waste-Resource Paradox: Practical dilemmas and societal implications in the transition to a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126831
Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042
Homrich, A. S., Galvão, G., Abadia, L. G., & Carvalho, M. M. (2018). The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 175(11), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064
Hussain, M., & Malik, M. (2020). Organizational enablers for circular economy in the context of sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120375
Jia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189(1), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.248
Melo, M. F. (2016). ONGS e relações institucionais: primeiro, segundo e terceiro setores. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, 52(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.4013/csu.2016.52.1.11
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Vol. 2. SAGE Publications.
Misoczky, M. C. (2005). O isomorfismo normativo e a análise de organizações de saúde. RAE Eletrônica, 4, (1). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1676-56482005000100009
MPPR, Ministério Público do Paraná. (2022). Terceiro Setor - Perguntas frequentes - Centro de Apoio Operacional das Promotorias das Fundações e do Terceiro Setor. Disponível em: https://fundacoes.mppr.mp.br/modules/conteudo/conteudo.php?conteudo=118. Acessado em: 20 de julho de 2022.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C
Park, J., Sarkis, J., & Wu, Z. (2010). Creating integrated business and environmental value within the context of China’s circular economy and ecological modernization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(15), 1494–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.001
Peci, A., Vieira, M. M. F., & Clegg, S. R. (2006). A construção do “Real” e práticas discursivas: o poder nos processos de institucionaliz(ação). Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 10(3), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-65552006000300004
Rauch, E., Dallinger, M., Dallasega, P., & Matt, D. T. (2015). Sustainability in manufacturing through distributed manufacturing systems (DMS). Procedia CIRP, 29, 544–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.069
Saldanha, G., & O’Brien, S. (2014). Research methodologies in translation studies. In Routledge, v. 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676x.2015.1109906
Silva, N. E. F., Coelho, P. F, & Cavalcante, C. E. (2016). Isomorfismo e sustentabilidade: análise nas empresas do setor elétrico brasileiro. Exacta, 14(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.v14n2.6229
Silveira, R. M. (2021). Caminhos da inclusão social à luz da política nacional de resíduos sólidos. 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital.
Stacey, J., & Rittberger, B. (2003). Dynamics of formal and informal institutional change in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 858–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000148342
Storopoli, J., Ramos, H., Quirino, G., & Rufin, C. (2019). Themes and methods in sustainability research. Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, 8(3), 410–430. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v8i3.15731
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1999). The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218556.n6
United Nations. (2021). Glasgow Climate Pact. Decision / Conference of the Parties. n. 26.
Wiesmeth, H., Shavgulidze, N., & Tevzadze, N. (2018). Environmental policies for drinks packaging in Georgia: A mini-review of EPR policies with a focus on incentive compatibility. Waste Management & Research, 36(11), 1004–1015.
Winkler, H. (2011). Closed-loop production systems - A sustainable supply chain approach. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 4(3), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.05.001
Xiao, X., & Zeng, H. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and circular economy capability: Based on the perspective of institutional pressure. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 37(7), 1793-1804. 10.12011/1000-6788(2017)07-1793-12
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos. 5 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 2(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075478
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Administração da UFSM
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
