What motivates Sao Paulo citizens to use bicycles as a mode of transportation? A study in the light of the Goal-Framing Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465969044Schlagworte:
Goal Framing, Motivation, Bycicle, Transportation, LogitAbstract
Purpose – What motivates Sao Paulo citizens to use bicycles as a mode of transportation? To answer this question, we conceptually rely on the Goal-Framing Theory (Lindenberg, 2000), which seeks to understand how individual choices are made, and exogeneous variables such as climate and temperature which might influence in this decision.
Design/methodology/approach – Empirically, we conduct a quantitative study, relying on primary data from 252 respondents and analyzed by means of logistic regression models, through which we obtained the likelihood of using bikes and the relative weights of each of the variables defined in our theoretical section.
Findings – What motivates Sao Paulo residents are not economic reasons, but rather normative (doing what is right) or hedonic (the pursuit of personal satisfaction) aspects. In other words, we demonstrate that cyclists make this choice to comply with a norm, seeking for benefits to the environment and directly or indirectly to society, as opposed to benefitting individually from this decision.
Practical implications – The research has implication for public policies.
Originality/value – The study is one of the first to empirically test the Goal Framing Theory (Lindenberg, 2000) and, as far as we could tell, the first to assess the motivations for the use of bicycles as a means of transportation in Brazil and in Latin America.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Alreck, P. L., Settle, R. B., & Robert, S. (1995). The survey research handbook. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Beck, M., & Immers, L. (1994). Bicycle Ownership and Use in Amsterdam. Transportation Research Record.
Brandenburg, C., Matzarakis, A., & Arnberger, A. (2007). Weather and cycling - a first approach to the effects of weather conditions on cycling. Meteorological Applications, 14(1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.6
Cole-Hunter, T., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Curto, A., Ambros, A., Valentin, A., Garcia-Aymerich, J., . . . Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015). Objective correlates and determinants of bicycle commuting propensity in an urban environment. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 40, 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.004
Coleman, J. S. (1988). SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE CREATION OF HUMAN-CAPITAL. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
de Hartog, J. J., Boogaard, H., Nijland, H., & Hoek, G. (2010). Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks? Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(8), 1109-1116. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901747
Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. Transportation Research Record, 1828(1), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.3141/1828-14
Flynn, B. S., Dana, G. S., Sears, J., & Aultman-Hall, L. (2012). Weather factor impacts on commuting to work by bicycle. Preventive Medicine, 54(2), 122-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.11.002
Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2012). Teams, Team Motivation, and the Theory of the Firm. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5-6), 369-383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2559
Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2013). Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0103
Gerike, R., de Nazelle, A., Wittwer, R., & Parkin, J. (2019). Special Issue "Walking and Cycling for better Transport, Health and the Environment". Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 123, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.010
Granovetter, M. (1985). ECONOMIC-ACTION AND SOCIAL-STRUCTURE - THE PROBLEM OF EMBEDDEDNESS. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Handy, S., Van Wee, B., & Kroesen, M. (2014). Promoting Cycling for Transport: Research Needs and Challenges. Transport Reviews, 34(1), 4-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.860204
Handy, S. L., Xing, Y., & Buehler, T. J. (2010). Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: a study of six small U.S. cities. Transportation, 37(6), 967-985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9269-x
Lindenberg, S. (2000). The extension of rationality: Framing versus cognitive rationality. In F. C. J. Beachler, R. Kamrane (Ed.), L'Acteur Et Ses Raisons. Mélanges En l'Honneur De Raymond Boudon. (pp. 168 - 204). Press Universitaire de France.
Lindenberg, S. (2001). Intrinsic motivation in a new light. Kyklos, 54(2-3), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00156
Lindenberg, S. (2006). Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, B. Buunk, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 23-44). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_2
Lindenberg, S. (2007). Social Rationality, Semi-Modularity and Goal-Framing: What Is It All About? Analyse & Kritik, 30(2), 669-687. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2008-0217
Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. J. (2011). MANAGING JOINT PRODUCTION MOTIVATION: THE ROLE OF GOAL FRAMING AND GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500-525. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.61031808
Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior [Article]. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x
Lindenberg, S. M., & Steg, L. (2013). Goal-framing theory and norm-guided environmental behavior. In H. C. M. v. Trijp (Ed.), Encouraging sustainable behavior: Psychology and the environment (pp. 37-54). Psychology Press.
Mirzaei, E., & Mignot, D. (2021). An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran. Sustainability, 13(12), Article 6896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126896
Monteiro, B., & Naslavsky, D. (2018). O que falta para as ciclovias de SP deslancharem para valer? 7 de Dezembro. https://vejasp.abril.com.br/cidades/artigo-ciclovias-brunomonteiro-david-naslavsky. Acesso em 26/04/2021.
Nankervis, M. (1998). Our urban parks: Suitable pieces of real estate? Journal of Australian Studies, 22(57), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443059809387389
Nosal, T., & Miranda-Moreno, L. F. (2014). The effect of weather on the use of North American bicycle facilities: A multi-city analysis using automatic counts. Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 66, 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.012
Pucher, J., Dill, J., & Handy, S. (2010). Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine, 50, S106-S125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028
Rerat, P. (2019). Cycling to work: Meanings and experiences of a sustainable practice. Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 123, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.017
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). RATIONAL CHOICE AND THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS. Journal of Business, 59(4), S251-S278. https://doi.org/10.1086/296365
Van Lierop, D., Grimsrud, M., & El-Geneidy, A. (2015). Breaking into Bicycle Theft: Insights from Montreal, Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(7), 490-501.
Verma, M., Rahul, T. M., Reddy, P. V., & Verma, A. (2016). The factors influencing bicycling in the Bangalore city. Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 89, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.006
Vieira, B. (2021). Capital paulista tem aumento de 66% nas vendas de bicicletas em 2020, diz associação. 28 de Abril. https://g1.globo.com/sp/sao-paulo/noticia/2021/03/28/capitalpaulista-tem-aumento-de-66percent-nas-vendas-de-bicicletas-em-2020-dizassociacao.ghtml. Acesso em 14/05/202.
Westin, K., Nordlund, A., Jansson, J., & Nilsson, J. (2020). Goal Framing as a Tool for Changing People's Car Travel Behavior in Sweden. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093695
Yamane, T. (1967). Elementary Sampling Theory. Prentice-Hall.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Administração da UFSM
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
