What motivates Sao Paulo citizens to use bicycles as a mode of transportation? A study in the light of the Goal-Framing Theory

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465969044

Schlagworte:

Goal Framing, Motivation, Bycicle, Transportation, Logit

Abstract

Purpose – What motivates Sao Paulo citizens to use bicycles as a mode of transportation? To answer this question, we conceptually rely on the Goal-Framing Theory (Lindenberg, 2000), which seeks to understand how individual choices are made, and exogeneous variables such as climate and temperature which might influence in this decision.

Design/methodology/approach – Empirically, we conduct a quantitative study, relying on primary data from 252 respondents and analyzed by means of logistic regression models, through which we obtained the likelihood of using bikes and the relative weights of each of the variables defined in our theoretical section.

Findings – What motivates Sao Paulo residents are not economic reasons, but rather normative (doing what is right) or hedonic (the pursuit of personal satisfaction) aspects. In other words, we demonstrate that cyclists make this choice to comply with a norm, seeking for benefits to the environment and directly or indirectly to society, as opposed to benefitting individually from this decision.

Practical implications – The research has implication for public policies.

Originality/value – The study is one of the first to empirically test the Goal Framing Theory  (Lindenberg,  2000) and, as far as we could tell, the first to assess the motivations for the use of bicycles as a means of transportation in Brazil and in Latin America.

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Autor/innen-Biografien

Felipe Fedrigo Foltram, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP

Bachelor in Business Administration – FEAUSP

Paula Sarita Bigio Schnaider, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP

Professor at FEAUSP. PhD in Economics (University of Paris 1- Panthéon-Sorbonne) and in Business (FEA-USP).

Juliano Pelegrina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP

PhD candidate and MSc. in Business – FEA-USP, Mechanical Engineer – Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)

Literaturhinweise

Alreck, P. L., Settle, R. B., & Robert, S. (1995). The survey research handbook. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Beck, M., & Immers, L. (1994). Bicycle Ownership and Use in Amsterdam. Transportation Research Record.

Brandenburg, C., Matzarakis, A., & Arnberger, A. (2007). Weather and cycling - a first approach to the effects of weather conditions on cycling. Meteorological Applications, 14(1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.6

Cole-Hunter, T., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Curto, A., Ambros, A., Valentin, A., Garcia-Aymerich, J., . . . Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015). Objective correlates and determinants of bicycle commuting propensity in an urban environment. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 40, 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.004

Coleman, J. S. (1988). SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE CREATION OF HUMAN-CAPITAL. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

de Hartog, J. J., Boogaard, H., Nijland, H., & Hoek, G. (2010). Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks? Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(8), 1109-1116. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901747

Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. Transportation Research Record, 1828(1), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.3141/1828-14

Flynn, B. S., Dana, G. S., Sears, J., & Aultman-Hall, L. (2012). Weather factor impacts on commuting to work by bicycle. Preventive Medicine, 54(2), 122-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.11.002

Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2012). Teams, Team Motivation, and the Theory of the Firm. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5-6), 369-383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2559

Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2013). Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0103

Gerike, R., de Nazelle, A., Wittwer, R., & Parkin, J. (2019). Special Issue "Walking and Cycling for better Transport, Health and the Environment". Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 123, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.010

Granovetter, M. (1985). ECONOMIC-ACTION AND SOCIAL-STRUCTURE - THE PROBLEM OF EMBEDDEDNESS. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Handy, S., Van Wee, B., & Kroesen, M. (2014). Promoting Cycling for Transport: Research Needs and Challenges. Transport Reviews, 34(1), 4-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.860204

Handy, S. L., Xing, Y., & Buehler, T. J. (2010). Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: a study of six small U.S. cities. Transportation, 37(6), 967-985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9269-x

Lindenberg, S. (2000). The extension of rationality: Framing versus cognitive rationality. In F. C. J. Beachler, R. Kamrane (Ed.), L'Acteur Et Ses Raisons. Mélanges En l'Honneur De Raymond Boudon. (pp. 168 - 204). Press Universitaire de France.

Lindenberg, S. (2001). Intrinsic motivation in a new light. Kyklos, 54(2-3), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00156

Lindenberg, S. (2006). Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, B. Buunk, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 23-44). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_2

Lindenberg, S. (2007). Social Rationality, Semi-Modularity and Goal-Framing: What Is It All About? Analyse & Kritik, 30(2), 669-687. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2008-0217

Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. J. (2011). MANAGING JOINT PRODUCTION MOTIVATION: THE ROLE OF GOAL FRAMING AND GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500-525. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.61031808

Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior [Article]. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x

Lindenberg, S. M., & Steg, L. (2013). Goal-framing theory and norm-guided environmental behavior. In H. C. M. v. Trijp (Ed.), Encouraging sustainable behavior: Psychology and the environment (pp. 37-54). Psychology Press.

Mirzaei, E., & Mignot, D. (2021). An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran. Sustainability, 13(12), Article 6896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126896

Monteiro, B., & Naslavsky, D. (2018). O que falta para as ciclovias de SP deslancharem para valer? 7 de Dezembro. https://vejasp.abril.com.br/cidades/artigo-ciclovias-brunomonteiro-david-naslavsky. Acesso em 26/04/2021.

Nankervis, M. (1998). Our urban parks: Suitable pieces of real estate? Journal of Australian Studies, 22(57), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443059809387389

Nosal, T., & Miranda-Moreno, L. F. (2014). The effect of weather on the use of North American bicycle facilities: A multi-city analysis using automatic counts. Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 66, 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.012

Pucher, J., Dill, J., & Handy, S. (2010). Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine, 50, S106-S125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028

Rerat, P. (2019). Cycling to work: Meanings and experiences of a sustainable practice. Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 123, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.017

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). RATIONAL CHOICE AND THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS. Journal of Business, 59(4), S251-S278. https://doi.org/10.1086/296365

Van Lierop, D., Grimsrud, M., & El-Geneidy, A. (2015). Breaking into Bicycle Theft: Insights from Montreal, Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(7), 490-501.

Verma, M., Rahul, T. M., Reddy, P. V., & Verma, A. (2016). The factors influencing bicycling in the Bangalore city. Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 89, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.006

Vieira, B. (2021). Capital paulista tem aumento de 66% nas vendas de bicicletas em 2020, diz associação. 28 de Abril. https://g1.globo.com/sp/sao-paulo/noticia/2021/03/28/capitalpaulista-tem-aumento-de-66percent-nas-vendas-de-bicicletas-em-2020-dizassociacao.ghtml. Acesso em 14/05/202.

Westin, K., Nordlund, A., Jansson, J., & Nilsson, J. (2020). Goal Framing as a Tool for Changing People's Car Travel Behavior in Sweden. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093695

Yamane, T. (1967). Elementary Sampling Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Veröffentlicht

2022-12-20

Zitationsvorschlag

Foltram, F. F., Schnaider, P. S. B., & Pelegrina, J. (2022). What motivates Sao Paulo citizens to use bicycles as a mode of transportation? A study in the light of the Goal-Framing Theory. Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 15, 701–720. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465969044