Diversidade do perfil dos gestores como uma alavanca estratégica para criação de valor: um enfoque no conservadorismo contábil de empresas brasileiras e francesas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465934050Abstract
Objetivo - A pesquisa objetivou analisar a relação entre a diversidade do perfil dos gestores, como uma alavanca para a criação de valor, e o conservadorismo contábil de empresas brasileiras e francesas.
Desenho/metodologia/abordagem - A amostra constituiu-se de 71 empresas brasileiras e 67 empresas francesas, listadas no Índice IBrX-100 da B3 e Índice SBF 120 da Euronext Paris, respectivamente. Para a análise dos dados (2011 a 2015) utilizou-se a Regressão Múltipla.
Resultados - Os resultados revelaram que as características da diversidade do perfil dos gestores brasileiros que se relacionam com o conservadorismo contábil são: idade, local da formação e cargo ocupado no corpo diretivo. Na França, as características são: grau de escolaridade, vínculo com a empresa e função exercida.
Limitações/implicações da pesquisa – Destaca-se a limitação da impossibilidade da generalização dos resultados. Como contribuições teóricas esta pesquisa analisa um elemento que pode ser considerado para as análises diante da temática do conservadorismo contábil: o perfil dos gestores.
Implicações práticas - A diversidade do perfil dos gestores deve ser considerada nas empresas, visto que apresenta reflexos no conservadorismo contábil, isto é, na maneira como os gestores conduzem a contabilidade no intuito de maximizar o valor da empresa.
Implicações sociais – Os achados apresentam implicações sociais para os profissionais que almejam inserir-se no mercado de trabalho brasileiro e francês.
Originalidade/valor – O estudo avança na área contábil, pois analisa o corpo diretivo das organizações, um diferencial importante frente à análise das características demográficas, profissionais e de atuação dos gestores e sua relação com o conservadorismo contábil.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Ahmed, A. S. & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2), 411-437.
B3 – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão. Índice Brasil 100 – IBrX-100. 2019. Disponível em: < http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/pt_br/produtos/indices/indices-amplos/indice-brasil-100-ibrx-100.htm>. Acesso em: 18 Mai. 2019.
Ball, R. & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.
Ball, R., Kothari, S. P. & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1-51.
Bamber, L. S., Jiang, J. & Wang, I. Y. (2010). What's my style? The influence of top managers on voluntary corporate financial disclosure. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 1131-1162.
Barkema, H. G. & Shvyrkov, O. (2007). Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion?. Strategic Management Journal, 28(7), 663-680.
Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings 1. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3-37.
Benschop, Y. & Meihuizen, H. E. (2002). Keeping up gendered appearances: representations of gender in financial annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 611-636.
Bertrand, M. & Schoar, A. (2002). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Working Paper, 1(1), 1-44.
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board
Diversity, and Firm Value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
Duong, L. & Evans, J. (2016). Gender differences in compensation and earning management: Evidence from Australian CFOs. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 1(1), 1-41.
Euronext Paris. Índice SBF 120 da Euronext Paris. 2019. Disponível em: < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SBF_120>. Acesso em: 18 Mai. 2019.
Fávero, L. P. (2015). Análise de Dados: Modelos de Regressão com Excel®, STATA® e SPSS®. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Francis, B., Hasan, I., Park, J. C. & Wu, Q. (2014). Gender differences in financial reporting decision making: Evidence from accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1285-1318.
Frijns, B., Dodd, O., & Cimerova, H. (2016). The impact of cultural diversity in corporate boards on firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1(1), 1-16.
Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M. & Rodríguez-Dominguez, L. (2010). The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance. Revista de Contabilidad, 13(1), 53-88.
García Lara, J. M. G. & Mora, A. (2004). Balance sheet versus earnings conservatism in Europe. European Accounting Review, 13(2), 261-292.
Ge, W., Matsumoto, D., & Zhang, J. L. (2011). Do CFOs have style? An empirical investigation of the effect of individual CFOs on accounting practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 1141-1179.
Gonzaga, R. P. & Costa, F. M da. (2009). A relação entre o conservadorismo contábil e os conflitos entre acionistas controladores e minoritários sobre as políticas de dividendos nas empresas brasileiras listadas na Bovespa. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 20(50), 95-109.
Graham, J., & Harvey, C. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 187-243.
Habib, A. & Hossain, M. (2013). CEO/CFO characteristics and financial reporting quality: A review. Research in Accounting Regulation, 25(1), 88-100.
Hafsi, T. & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463-479.
Haynes, K. (2016). Accounting as gendering and gendered: A review of 25 years of critical accounting research on gender. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 1(1), 1-15.
Ho, S. S. M., Li, A. Y., Tam, K. & Zhang, F. (2015). CEO gender, ethical leadership, and accounting conservatism. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 351-370.
Holck, L., Muhr, S. L. & Villesèche, F. (2016). Identity, diversity and diversity management: on theoretical connections, assumptions and implications for practice. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(1), 48-64.
Jackson, S., May, K. E. & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, 204(1), 204-261.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen, M., & Zajac, E. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 507-524.
Jiang, J. X., Petroni, K. R., & Wang, I. Y. (2010). CFOs and CEOs: Who have the most influence on earnings management? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(1), 513-526.
Khaw, K. L.-H., Liao, J., Tripe, D. & Wongchoti, U. (2016). Gender diversity, state control, and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 39(1), 141-158.
Lafond, R., & Roychowdhury, S. (2008). Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 101-135.
Lafond, R. & Watts, R. L. (2007). The Information Role of Conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 447-478.
Lounsbury, J. W., Sundstrom, E. D., Gibson, L. W., Loveland, J. M. & Drost, A. W. (2016). Core personality traits of managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 434-450.
Ng, E. S. W. & Sears, G. J. (2010). The effect of adverse impact in selection practices on organizational diversity: A field study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(9), 1454-1471.
OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Productivity and long term growth. 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.oecd.org/economy/growth/>. Acesso em: 15 Ago. 2016.
Perryman, A. A., Fernando, G. D. & Tripathy, A. (2016). Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 579-586.
Rahman, A., Yammeesri, J. & Perera, H. (2010). Financial reporting quality in international settings: A comparative study of the USA, Japan, Thailand, France and Germany. The International Journal of Accounting, 45(1), 1-34.
Rangéon, F. V. (2004). Le levier institutionnel: référendum et réforme électorale. Annuaire des Collectivités Locales, 24(1), 53-63.
Ruch, G. W. & Taylor, G. (2015). Accounting Conservatism: A review of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34(1), 17-38.
Saboly, M. (2003). La prudence comptable: perspectives historique et théorique. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 9(1), 153-169.
Shen, J., D'Netto, B. & Tang, J. (2010). Effects of human resource diversity management on organizational citizen behaviour in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2156-2172.
Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives. Readings in Accounting for Management Control, 1(1), 622-645.
Smith, N., Smith, V. & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569-593.
Subeliani, D. & Tsogas, G. (2005). Managing diversity in the Netherlands: a case study of Rabobank. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 831-851.
Watts, R. L. (1993). A proposal for research on conservatism. Simon School of Business Working Paper, 1(1), 93-13.
Watts, R. L. (2003a). Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 207-221.
Watts, R. L. (2003b). Conservatism in Accounting Part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 287-301.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice Hall.
Yunos, R. M., Ahmad, S. A. & Sulaiman, N. (2014). The influence of internal governance mechanisms on accounting conservatism. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164(1), 501-507.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Administração da UFSM
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
