“Trusting with one eye and distrusting with the other”: negotiations among catireiros in the Triângulo Mineiro and Alto Paranaíba regions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465931478Abstract
Although negotiation is regarded as one of the most fruitful business activities to address trust and honesty in decision making, studies on this topic are still necessary for the conceptual advancement of the field. This paper aims to analyze the relationships based on trust and honesty among the catireiros based in the Triângulo Mineiro and Alto Paranaíba mesoregions of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in their negotiations. To achieve the proposed goal, we performed qualitative research, with an exploratory approach. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 31 catireiros of the Triângulo Mineiro and Alto Paranaíba regions and analyzed according to the postulates of French Discourse Analysis. We concluded that, on the one hand, honesty and trust are paramount for some catireiros and contribute to the strengthening of their prestige and reputation withing the groups in which they are inserted. In other words, these values operate as a way of legitimizing who those catireiros are and how they negotiate. On the other hand, the catira is also characterized as a potentially opportunistic practice, which may involve mistrust, lies, manipulation, and dishonesty as elements inherent to its process and conditions for traders to obtain advantages in their catiras.
Downloads
References
BACHMANN. R.; KNIGHTS, D.; SYDOW, J. Trust and control in organizational relations. Organization Studies, v. 22, n. 2, p. 5-8, 2001.
BACHMANN, R.; ZAHEER, A. Handbook of trust research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.
BARRY, B.; ROBINSON, R. Ethics in conflict resolution: the ties that bind. International Negotiation, n. 7, p. 137-142, 2002.
BONI, V.; QUARESMA, S. J. Aprendendo a entrevistar: como fazer entrevistas em Ciências Sociais. Tese – Revista Eletrônica dos Pós-Graduandos em Sociologia Política da UFSC, v. 2, n. 1, p. 68-80, jan./jul., 2005.
CARR, A. Is business bluffing ethical? Harvard Business Review, v. 46, p. 143-153, 1968.
CHILD, J. Trust – The Fundamental Bond in Global Collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, v.29, n.4, p. 274-288, 2001.
CHOUDHURY, Enamul. Trust in administration: An integrative approach to optimal trust. Administration & Society, v. 40, n. 6, p. 586-620, 2008.
CREMIN, C. Never employable enough: The (im) possibility of satisfying the boss’s desire. Organization, v. 17, n. 2, p. 131-149, 2010.
DEES, J.; CRAMTON, P. Shrewd bargaining on the moral frontier: toward a theory of morality in practice. Business Ethics Quarterly, n. 1, p. 135-167, 1991.
DEGOB, R.; PALASSI, M. P. Os sentidos da participação dos colaboradores nos projetos e ações sociais dos Correios do Estado do Espírito Santo. Organizações & Sociedade, v.16, p.265-286, 2009.
DENZIN, N. K.; LINCOLN, Y. S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. 2. ed. London: Sage, 2000.
DIETZ, G. Going back to the source: Why do people trust each other?. Journal of Trust Research, v. 1, n. 2, p. 215-222, 2011.
DRIVER, M. How trust functions in the context of identity work. Human Relations, v. 68, n. 6, p. 899-923, 2015.
DRUMMOND, V. S. Confiança e liderança nas organizações. São Paulo: Thomson Learning Edições, 2007.
FINK, M. Trust-based cooperation relationships between SMEs–are family firms any different? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, v. 1, n. 4, p. 382-397, 2010.
FINK, M; KESSLER, A. Cooperation, trust and performance–empirical results from three countries. British Journal of Management, v. 21, n. 2, p. 469-483, 2010.
FISHER, R.; URY, W.; PATTON, B. Getting to YES: Negotiation agreement without given in. Bouston: Houghton Miffllin, 1981.
FISHER, R.; URY, W.; PATTON, B. Como conduzir uma negociação? Porto: Edições Asa, 1993.
GIBSON, K. Harmony, Hobbes and rational negotiation: a reply to Dees and Cramtom’s “Promoting Honesty in Negotiation”. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 4, n. 3, p. 373-381, 1994.
GODOI, C. K.; BANDEIRA-DE-MELO, R.; SILVA, A. B. Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2010.
GULATI, R.; NICKERSON, J. A. Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science, v. 19, n. 5, p. 688–708, 2008.
HAIR, J. F. et al. Essentials of business research methods. New York: Routledge, 2016.
HARDIN, R. Trust and Trustworthiness. New-York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002.
HOECHT, A. The role of trust in strategic sourcing relationships. In: European Academy of Management Conference, May 9-11, 2002, Stockholm. Anais... Stockholm: EAMC, 2002.
HÖHMANN, H. H.; WELTER, F. Trust and entrepreneurship: A West-East perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005.
IBBOTT, C. J.; O´KEEFE, R. M. Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system. Infomation Systems Journal, v. 14, p. 131-152, 2004.
JANOWICZ, M; NOORDERHAVEN, N. Trust, calculation and interorganizational learning of tacit knowledge: An organizational roles perspective. Organization Studies, v. 30, n. 10, p.1021-1044, 2009.
KENNAN, J.; WILSON, R. Bargaining with private information. Journal of Economic Literature, n. 31, p. 45-104, 1993.
LEWICKI, R. J.; MCALLISTER, D. J.; BIES, R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, v. 23, n. 3, p. 438-458, 1998.
LEWICKI, R. J.; ROBINSON, R. Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: an empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, n. 17, p. 665-682, 1998.
LUHMANN, N. Trust and Power. Chichester: Wiley, 1979.
MANZINI, E. J. A entrevista na pesquisa social. Didática, São Paulo, v. 26/27, p. 149-158, 1991.
MAYER, R. C.; DAVIS, J. H.; SCHOORMAN, F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 3, p. 709-734, 1995.
MCALLISTER, D. J. The second face of trust: Reflections on the dark side of interpersonal trust in organizations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, v. 6, p. 87-112, 1997.
NEWELL, S. SWAN, J. Trust and inter-organizational networking. Human Relations. v. 53, n. 10, p. 1287-1328, 2000.
ORLANDI, E. P. Michel Pêcheux e a análise de discurso. Estudos da Língua(gem), v. 1, p. 9-13, 2005.
PALHARES, J. V.; COUTO, F. F.; CARRIERI, A. P. The Brazilian catira: identities and rationalities. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, v. 40, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2018.
PALHARES, J. V.; CARRIERI, A. P.; OLETO, A. F. As práticas cotidianas de negócio dos catireiros da região do Triângulo Mineiro e Alto Paranaíba. Gestão & Regionalidade, v. 35, n. 103, p. 245-261, 2019.
PATZELT, H.; SHEPHERD, D. A. The decision to persist with underperforming alliances: The role of trust and control. Journal of Management Studies, v. 45, n. 7, p. 1217-1243, 2008.
PÊCHEUX, M. Análise Automática do Discurso. In: GADET, F.; HAK, T. (Org.). Por uma análise automática do discurso: uma introdução à obra de Michel Pêcheux. 3. ed. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 1997, p. 61-162.
PEPPETT, S. R. Can saints negotiate? A brief introduction to the problems of perfect ethics in bargaining. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, n. 7, p. 83-96, 2002.
PUFFER, S. M.; MCCARTHY, D. J.; BOISOT, M. Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, v. 34, n. 3, p. 441-467, 2010.
REITZ, H. et al. Ethics in negotiation: oil and water or good lubrication? Business Horizons, p. 5-14, May/June 1998.
RIBEIRO, E. M.; GALIZONI, F. M. A arte da catira: negócios e reprodução familiar de sitiantes mineiros. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, São Paulo, v. 22, n. 64, jun. 2007.
ROUSSEAU, D. M. et al. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, v. 23, n. 3, p. 393-404, 1998.
SAUNDERS, M. N. K; DIETZ, G.; THORNHILL, A. Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing?. Human Relations, v. 67, n. 6, p. 639-665, 2014.
SEARLE, R.; SKINNER, D. Trust and human resource management. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.
SHAPIRO, S. P. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, v. 93, n. 3, p. 623-58, 1987.
SKINNER, D.; DIETZ, G.; WEIBEL, A. The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’. Organization, v. 21, n. 2, p. 206-224, 2014.
SOBRAL, F. J. B. A. O julgamento moral de dilemas éticos em negociação. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 10, n. 5, art. 170, p. 4-27, 2009.
SURI, H. Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, v. 11, n. 2, p. 63-75, 2011.
TEIXEIRA, M. L. M.; POPADIUK, S. Confiança e desenvolvimento de capital intelectual: o que os empregados esperam de seus líderes? Revista de Administração Contemporânea. Rio de Janeiro, v. 7, n. 2, p. 73-92, abr.-jun. 2003.
VALENZUELA, A.; CONTRERAS, O. F. Confianza e innovación tecnológica en pequeñas empresas: Las industrias metalmecánica y de tecnologías de la información de Sonora. Papeles de población, v. 19, n. 76, p. 233-269, 2013.
WEHMEYER, K; RIEMER, K.; SCHNEIDER, R. Roles and trust in international systems. In: Eighth Research Symposium on Emerging Electronic Markets. Anais... RSEEM, 2001.
WELTER, F. All you need is trust? A critical review of the trust and entrepreneurship literature. International Small Business Journal, v. 30, n. 3, p. 193-212, 2012.
WELTER, F.; SMALLBONE, D. Exploring the role of trust in entrepreneurial activity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 30, n. 4, p. 465-475, 2006.
WHITE, J. J. Machiavelli and the Bar: ethical limitations on lying in negotiation. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, p. 926-938, 1980.
WHITNEY, J. The Economics of Trust: Liberating profits & restoring corporate vitality. New York: Mac Graw-hill, 1993.
WILLIAMSON, O. E. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The Journal of Law and Economics, v. 36, n. 1, Part 2, p. 453-486, 1993.
ZOLIN, R.; KUCKERTZ, A.; KAUTONEN, T. Human resource flexibility and strong ties in entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Research, v. 64, n. 10, p. 1097-1103, 2011.
ZSOLNAI, L. Honesty and trust in economic relationships. Management Research News, v. 27, n. 7, p. 57-62, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
