Organizational hybridism and critical performativity in cooperatives: rereadings and research possibilities based on cooperative principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2359043248309Keywords:
organizational hybridism, critical performativity, cooperativism, cooperative principlesAbstract
By assuming their dual economic and social nature, cooperatives can be visualized in a hybrid way seeking a balance between the practices developed, so that they do not lose their principles. In parallel, the search for results that actually express the democratic aspirations of the cooperative members, drives its members to performance beyond the economic, orienting themselves to a critical performance. Thus, because we believe that there is a need for reinterpretations that investigate these organizations adequately, the objective of this theoretical essay is to analyze how the main aspects that characterize both organizational hybridism and critical performativity as theories can be used for the proper understanding of cooperative principles based on the practices developed by cooperatives. We believe that the discussions outlined here have the potential to generate numerous insights for new investigations since we have advanced in the discussion about forms of action and governance practices in cooperatives.
Downloads
References
ACI. Co-operative identity, values & principles. Disponível em: https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity?_ga=2.18306289.995099500.1587056770-263832590.1587056770. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2020.
AGGERI, F. Qu’est-ce que la performativité peut apporter aux recherches en management et sur les organisations. M@n@gement, v. 20, n. 1, p. 28, 2017. Disponível em: http://www.cairn.info/revue-management-2017-1-page-28.htm. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.201.0028
ALVESSON, M.; SPICER, A. Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, v. 65, n. 3, p. 367–390, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711430555
AMODEO, N. B. P. et al. A Organização do Quadro Social como instância participativa em duas cooperativas agropecuárias de Minas Gerais. Revista de Extensão e Estudo Rurais, v. 1, n. 2, p. 521–552, 2011.
AUDEBRAND, L. K. Expanding the scope of paradox scholarship on social enterprise: the case for (re)introducing worker cooperatives. M@n@gement, v. 20, n. 4, p. 368, 2017. Disponível em: http://www.cairn.info/revue-management-2017-4-page-368.htm. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.204.0368
BATTILANA, J. Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals’ Social Position. Organization, v. 13, n. 5, p. 653–676, 17 set. 2006. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1350508406067008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406067008
BATTILANA, J. et al. Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1658–1685, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0903
BATTILANA, J.; CASCIARO, T. Overcoming Resistance to Organizational Change: Strong Ties and Affective Cooptation. Management Science, v. 59, n. 4, p. 819–836, abr. 2013. Disponível em: http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1583
BATTILANA, J.; DORADO, S. Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case Of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, v. 53, n. 6, p. 1419–1440, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
BATTILANA, J.; LEE, M. Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing - Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, v. 8, n. 1, p. 397–441, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
BERTUOL, R.; CANÇADO, A. C.; SOUZA, M. F. A. A Prática dos Princípios Cooperativistas: Um Estudo de Caso no Tocantins. Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade, v. 1, n. 2, p. 7–18, 31 dez. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.bibliotekevirtual.org/index.php/2013-02-07-03-02-35/2013-02-07-03-03-11/766-aos/v01n02/7571-a-pratica-dos-principios-cooperativistas-um-estudo-de-caso-no-tocantins.html.
CABANTOUS, L. et al. Critical Essay: Reconsidering critical performativity. Human Relations, v. 69, n. 2, p. 197–213, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715584690
CANÇADO, A. C. S. M. DE F. A.; CARVALHO, J. E. F. B. DE; IWAMOTO, H. M. Desfazendo Um Mal Entendido: Discutindo as Diferenças Entre Lucros e Sobras. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, v. 1, n. 5, p. 28–33, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v5i1.449
CEZAR, L. C. Hibridismo organizacional e sua interface com a performatividade crítica: estudo de caso em uma cooperativa de cafeicultores Fair Trade do Espírito Santo. 2018. 178 f. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2018. Disponível em: http://portais4.ufes.br/posgrad/teses/tese_12890_TESE LAYON VERS%C3O FINAL PARA DEP%D3SITO.pdf.
CEZAR, L.; FANTINEL, L. The sales of craft over a Lively Talk and a cup of Coffee: social representations in a commercialization center of solidarity economy. Brazilian Business Review, v. 15, n. 5, p. 475–493, 1 set. 2018. Disponível em: http://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2018.15.5.5
CHENEY, G. et al. Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: Challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. Organization, v. 21, n. 5, p. 591–603, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414539784
CHU, R. A. Hibridização Organizacional e Cultural: o caso da integração pós-aquisição de uma escola de negócios a uma universidade no Brasil. 2013. 119 f. Tese (Doutorado), Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 2013.
CHU, R. A.; WOOD JR., T. Brazilian cultural organization in post-globalization: global or local? [Cultura organizacional brasileira pós-globalização: global ou local?]. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 42, n. 5, p. 969–991, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122008000500008&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122008000500008
DIMITRIADIS, S. et al. Blurring the Boundaries: The Interplay of Gender and Local Communities in the Commercialization of Social Ventures. Organization Science, v. 28, n. 5, p. 819–839, out. 2017. Disponível em: http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2017.1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1144
DOHERTY, B.; HAUGH, H.; LYON, F. Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 16, n. 4, p. 417–436, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
EBRAHIM, A.; BATTILANA, J.; MAIR, J. The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 34, p. 81–100, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
FERNANDES, P. H. C. et al. Benefit Corporation Legislation and the Emergence of a Social Hybrid Category. California Management Review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 315–348, 2015. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.5.
FLECHA, R.; NGAI, P. The challenge for Mondragon: Searching for the cooperative values in times of internationalization. Organization, v. 21, n. 5, p. 666–682, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414537625
FREITAS, A. F. DE et al. Organização do Quadro Social (OQS): uma inovação institucional na gestão social de Cooperativas. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, v. 2, n. 1, p. 45–66, 2010.
GIDDENS, A. A Constituição da Sociedade. 2. ed. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2003.
GRASSI, R. A. Williamson e “ formas híbridas ”: uma proposta de redefinição do debate. Economia e Sociedade, v. 1, n. 1, p. 43–64, 2003.
HERAS-SAIZARBITORIA, I. The ties that bind? Exploring the basic principles of worker-owned organizations in practice. Organization, v. 21, n. 5, p. 645–665, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414537623
HOLT, D.; LITTLEWOOD, D. Identifying, Mapping, and Monitoring the Impact of Hybrid Firms. California Management Review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 107–125, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.107
JOHNSON, B. Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems. Amhrest, MA: HRD Press, 1996.
KENNEDY, E. D. et al. Hybrid Organizations as Shape-Shifters: California management review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 59–83, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.59
KING, D. The possibilities and perils of critical performativity: Learning from four case studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, v. 31, n. 2, p. 255–265, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2014.11.002
KING, D.; LAND, C. The democratic rejection of democracy: Performative failure and the limits of critical performativity in an organizational change project. Human Relations, v. 71, n. 11, p. 1535–1557, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717751841
LAZZARINI, S. G.; BIALOSKORSKI NETO, S.; CHADDAD, F. R. Decisões financeiras em cooperativas: fontes de ineficiência e possíveis soluções. Gestão & Produção, v. 6, n. 3, p. 257–268, dez. 1999. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X1999000300010&lng=pt&tlng=pt. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X1999000300010
LECA, B.; GOND, J. P.; BARIN CRUZ, L. Building ‘Critical Performativity Engines’ for deprived communities: The construction of popular cooperative incubators in Brazil. Organization, v. 21, n. 5, p. 683–712, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414534647
LEE, C. et al. How the Zebra Got Its Stripes : Imprinting of Individuals and Hybrid Social Ventures. Harvard Business School Working Paper, v. 14, n. 005, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2291686
LEE, M.; JAY, J. Strategic Responses to Hybrid Social Ventures. California Management Review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 126–147, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.126
MAIGNAN, M. The collective interest cooperative company (SCIC), a social innovation : performativity of alternative models in the third sector organizations. Reimagining, Rethinking, Reshaping: Organizational Scholarship in Unsettled Times 30th EGOS Colloquium, Jul 2014, no halshs-01468643f. Rotterdam, Netherlands: [s.n.], 2014.
MAIGNAN, M.; ARNAUD, C.; CHATEAU TERRISSE, P. La gestion des tensions organisationnelles dans les coopératives multisociétaires à vocation sociale : le cas d’une Société Coopérative d’Intérêt Collectif dans le secteur du logement social. Management international, v. 22, n. 2, p. 128–143, 11 mar. 2019. Disponível em: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1058166ar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1058166ar
MARQUIS, C.; BATTILANA, J. Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 29, p. 283–302, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.001
MEIRA, F. B. Liminal organization: Organizational emergence within solidary economy in Brazil. Organization, v. 21, n. 5, p. 713–729, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414537621
MEYER, C.; HUDON, M. Alternative organizations in finance: Commoning in complementary currencies. Organization, v. 24, n. 5, p. 629–647, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417713216
OCASIO, W.; THORNTON, P. H.; LOUNSBURY, M. The Institutional Logics Perspective. In: GREENWOOD, R. et al. (Org.). . The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. 2. ed. [S.l.]: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2017. p. 928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n20
OCB. O que é cooperativismo. Disponível em: https://www.ocb.org.br/o-que-e-cooperativismo. Acesso em: 17 abr. 2020.
PARANQUE, B.; WILLMOTT, H. Cooperatives—saviours or gravediggers of capitalism? Critical performativity and the John Lewis Partnership. Organization, v. 21, n. 5, p. 604–625, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414537622
PEREIRA, J. R. et al. Cultura Organizacional e Cultura Brasileira: Compreendendo as Fragilidades do Cooperativismo Brasileiro. NAU Social, v. 4, n. 6, p. 61–81, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.periodicos.adm.ufba.br/index.php/rs/article/view/225.
RAWHOUSER, H.; CUMMINGS, M.; CRANE, A. Benefit Corporation Legislation and the Emergence of a Social Hybrid Category. California Management Review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 13–35, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.13
SANTOS, F. M.; PACHE, A.-C.; BIRKHOLZ, C. Making Hybrids Work: California management review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 36–59, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.36
SCHNEIDER, J. O. Democracia, participação e autonomia cooperativa. 2. ed. São Leopoldo: Editora Unisinos, 1999.
SERVA, M. Epistemologia da administração no Brasil: o estado da arte. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 15, n. 4, p. 741–750, dez. 2017. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512017000400741&lng=pt&tlng=pt. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395173209
SPICER, A.; ALVESSON, M.; KÄRREMAN, D. Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, v. 62, n. 4, p. 537–560, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101984
SPICER, A.; ALVESSON, M.; KÄRREMAN, D. Extending critical performativity. Human Relations, v. 69, n. 2, p. 225–249, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715614073
STOREY, J.; BASTERRETXEA, I.; SALAMAN, G. Managing and resisting ‘degeneration’ in employee-owned businesses: A comparative study of two large retailers in Spain and the United Kingdom. Organization, v. 21, n. 5, p. 626–644, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414537624
TEIXEIRA, M.; ROGLIO, K. The Influences of Institutional Logics Dynamics on Organizational History: the Case of Veiling Holambra Cooperative. Brazilian Business Review, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1–35, 5 fev. 2015. Disponível em: http://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2015.12.1.1
WOOD JR., T. Organizações híbridas. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 50, n. 2, p. 241–247, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902010000200008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Layon Carlos Cezar, Alexandre Reis Rosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can bring about productive change as well as increase impact and impact. citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
