Environmental Education, a Case Study: Meliponary in the Colégio Estadual Modelo in the Municipality of Ijuí, RS

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130828834

Palabras clave:

Joint action, Meliponário, Environmental education

Resumen

The purpose of this article is to analyze the joint action of the Ijuiense associations for Environmental Protection, the Bandeirantes do Verde Meio Ambiente Association and the Colégio Estadual Modelo de Ijuí on the importance of bee pollination for the ecosystem. This being a case study, which resulted in the possibility of a Meliponary praxis within a school. To this end, a bibliographic research was carried out on stingless bees: Michener (2007), Almeida (2008), Villas-Bôas (2018), Imperatriz-Fonsceca; Dias (2004) and environmental education: Bölter (2018), Almeida (2008), Freire (2004), Vieira (2011), Louv (2016). It was verified with this case study that the union of efforts of these entities allowed the involvement of the school community including teachers and students, offering a practical possibility focused on environmental education and its universe, with direct observation and interaction.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Indaia Schock, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Graduada em Administração de Empresas pela Universidade Norte do Paraná. Mestranda em Educação pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria e também cursa Licenciatura em Educação Física pela Universidade de Brasília. 

Jorge Orlando Cuellar Nogueira, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Concluiu o Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina em 2000. Foi coordenador do curso de pós graduação em educação ambiental a distância e professor associado III da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Recebeu dois (2) prêmios e/ou homenagens pelas atuações na área ambiental.

Citas

ALMEIDA, Paulo Nunes de. Educação lúdica: técnicas e jogos pedagógicos. São Paulo, SP: Loyola, 2008.

ALVES, Rubem. Conversas com quem gosta de ensinar. 28. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 1993. (Coleção questões da nossa época; v. 11)

BIESMEIJER, J. C.; SLAA, E. J. Information Flow Organization of Stingless Bee Foraging, Apidologie, v. 35, p.143-157, 2004.

BÖLTER, S.G., & NOGUEIRA, S.V. (2018) Educação ambiental e os desafiros para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Ambiente & Educação, 23 (2), 452-465.

FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários a prática educativa. 25. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2004.

GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 5.ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.

GONZÁLEZ REY, F. L. Pesquisa qualitativa em psicologia: caminhos e desafios. 2.ed. São Paulo: Thomson Pioneira, 2005.

IMPERATRIZ-FONSCECA, V.L; DIAS, B.F.S. Brazilian Pollinator Initiative. In: Freitas BM, Pereira JOP. Solitary bees: conservation, rearing and management for pollination. Fortaleza: Imprensa Universitaria; 2004.

LOUV, R. A última criança na natureza – resgatando nossas crianças do transtorno de déficit de natureza. 1ed. São Paulo. Ed. Aquariana, 2016.

LAKATOS, Eva Maria; MARCONI, Marina de Andrade. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2003.

LAKATOS, Eva Maria. Fundamentos de metodologia. São Paulo: Atlas 2003.

MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza (org.). Pesquisa Social. Teoria, método e criatividade.18 ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2001.

PEREIRA, Lucia Helena Pena. Bioexpressão: a caminho de uma educação lúdica para a formação de educadores. Rio de Janeiro: Mauad X: Bapera, 2005.

PRODANOV, Cleber Cristiano. Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico / Cleber Cristiano Prodanov, Ernani Cesar de Freitas. – 2. ed. – Novo Hamburgo: Feevale, 2013.

MICHENER C.D.; The bees of the World. Baltimore. USA: The John Hopkins University Press; 2007.

RUDIO, Franz Victor. Introdução ao projeto de pesquisa cientifica. 30. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002.

STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I; TSCHARNTKE, T .1999. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities an seed set. Oecologia, 121: 432-440

VIEIRA, Fernando Zan; ROSSO, Ademir José. O Cinema como Componente Didático da Educação Ambiental. Revista Diálogo Educacional. Paraná: PUCPR, 2011. Disponível em: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/dialogoeducacional/article/view/4432/4357 Acesso em: 11 de fev. 2021.

VILLAS-BÔAS, Jerônimo. Manual Tecnológico de Aproveitamento Integral dos Produtos das Abelhas Nativas Sem Ferrão. Brasília – DF. Instituto Sociedade, População e Natureza (ISPN). 2a edição. Brasil, 2018.

LAKATOS, Eva Maria; MARCONI, Marina de Andrade. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. São Paulo: Atlas 2003.

TRUJILLO FERRARI, Alfonso. Metodologia da ciência. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: 1974.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-04-26

Cómo citar

Schock, I., & Nogueira, J. O. C. (2021). Environmental Education, a Case Study: Meliponary in the Colégio Estadual Modelo in the Municipality of Ijuí, RS. Revista Monografias Ambientais, 1, e4. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130828834

Número

REMOA, V. 20, 2021

Sección

PRÁTICAS EDUCATIVAS AMBIENTAIS

Licencia

Disponível aqui

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.