Premissas para a elaboração do plano de educação ambiental para a Área de Proteção Ambiental do Banhado Grande

Authors

  • Aurici Azevedo da Rosa Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087087

Keywords:

Plan for Environmental Education, Sustainability, Environmental Educators

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Area of Banhado Grande - APABG is a large area, which involves adiversity of habitats, fauna and flora, besides covering four municipalities Viamão, Gravataí,Glorinha and Santo Antônio da Patrulha. Being a APA, it is a type of protected area for sustainableuse. With few years of existence is still little known and suffers from all kinds of degradation. Thiswork intends to list theoretical and methodological assumptions that collaborate with thedevelopment of Environmental Education Plan for this unit. To this end, there was a literaturereview and two quantitative research where the first, aimed to diagnose the level of knowledgereagarding APABG and the “Refúgo da Vida Silvestre Banhado dos Pachecos”, a conservation unitinserted into the APA. This survey was conducted in the region of Águas Claras / Viamão. Thesecond survey was the mapping of actions in the environmental education in the constituentmunicipalities of the unit. This was intended to form a framework of knowledge associated with alltheir reality and complexity of environmental and social relations in the region serving thus,guidance and foundation for the preparation of the plan and the proposal for formation ofenvironmental educators for the APA, aiming its sustainability. The theoretical assumptions are based on the formation of citizenship, environmental awareness and on the Critical EnvironmentalEducation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aurici Azevedo da Rosa, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Especialista em Educação Ambiental/UFSM

References

ACCORDI, I. A. Estrutura espacial e sazonal da Avifauna e considerações sobre a conservação de aves aquáticas em uma área umidade do RS, Brasil. 2003. 171 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2003.

BRASIL. Lei n. 9.795, de 27 de abril de 1999. Dispõe sobre a educação ambiental, institui a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 28 abr. 1999. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=321. Acesso em: 21 out. 2011.

______. Lei n. 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Cria o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação – SNUC. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 18 jul. 2000. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9985.htm. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2011.

______. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Identidades da Educação Ambiental Brasileira. Philippe P Layrargues [Coord.]. Brasília: MMA, 2004.

______. Ministério da Educação. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Programa Nacional de Educação Ambiental – ProNEA. Brasília: CID – Ambiental, 2005, 3ed.

CARVALHO, I. C. de M. Educação ambiental: a formação do sujeito ecológico. São Paulo: Cortez, 2004.

DIAS, G. F. Fundamentos de Educação Ambiental. Brasília: Universa, 2000.

____, G. F. Educação Ambiental: Princípios e Práticas. São Paulo: Gaia, 2003. 8. ed.

MORIN, E. Os Setes Saberes necessários a Educação do Futuro. São Paulo: Cortez; DF: UNESCO, 2005.

RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Secretaria da Agricultura e Abastecimento. Plano de Manejo Parque Estadual de Itapuã. Margô Guadalupe Antonio (Coord.). Porto Alegre: DRNR, 1996. Disponível em: http://www.sema.rs.gov.br/upload/Plano_manejo_PEItapua.pdf. Acesso em: 2 nov. 2011.

_____________________. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente. Banhado dos Pachecos está implementado. Portal do Meio Ambiente, RS, 10 jun. 2002. Disponível em: http://www.sema.rs.gov.br/conteudo.asp?cod_menu=4&cod_conteudo=2954. Acesso em: 18 set. 2011.

_____________________. Secretaria do Meio ambiente. Unidades de Conservação. Proteger os ecossistemas é conservar a biodiversidade. RS, 2009.

_____________________. Secretaria do Meio ambiente. Portaria SEMA n. 025, 25 de junho de 2009. Cria o Conselho Deliberativo da Área de Proteção Ambiental - APA do Banhado Grande e dá outras providências. Disponível em: http://www.sema.rs.gov.br/upload/Portaria%2025_2009_Cria%20Conselho%20Deliberativo%20%C3%81rea%20Prote%C3%A7ao%20APA%20Banhado%20Grande.pdf. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2009.

_____________________. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente. Termo de Referência para elaboração do Plano de Manejo da Área de Proteção Ambiental do Banhado Grande. DEFAP/DUC, Porto Alegre, 2010.

_____________________. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente. RS: cervos-do-pantanal são encontrados no Banhado dos Pachecos. Assessoria de Comunicação da SEMA/RS, 05 nov. 2010. Disponível em: http://amarnatureza.org.br/site/rs-cervos-do-pantanal-sao-encontradas-no-banhado-dospachecos,71740/. Acesso em 29 set. 2011.

VENDRAMETTO, L. P. Educação Ambiental nas Unidades de Conservação: um estudo de caso na Área de Proteção Ambiental de Sousas e Joaquim Egídio. Piracicaba, SP, fev. 2004. Disponível em: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11150/tde-06102004-165858/pt-br.php. Acesso em 22 set. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-13

How to Cite

Rosa, A. A. da. (2013). Premissas para a elaboração do plano de educação ambiental para a Área de Proteção Ambiental do Banhado Grande. Monografias Ambientais, 10(10), 2241–2251. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087087

Issue

REMOA, V. 10, N. 10, OUT.-DEZ., 2012

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.