Museus escolares: a utilização de técnicas de taxidermia como auxílio no ensino da educação ambiental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086312Keywords:
Museum School, Taxidermy techniques, Environmental EducationAbstract
This work was conducted in order to study the issue : ” Museum School: The Use of TechnicalAssistance as Taxidermy in School of Environmental Education” .The research was theoreticalliterature evidence base in order to know the different scientific contributions on the subjectinvestigated. The survey data were collected and systematized by the study of books, articles,monographs and websites.
Downloads
References
AURICCHIO, P., SALOMÃO M. G. Técnicas de Coleta e Preparação de Vertebrados, São Paulo, SP. Instituto Pau Brasil Historia Natural, FAPESP, 2001.
BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: terceiro e quarto ciclos do ensino fundamental -Temas Transversais. Brasília: MEC/Secretaria de Educação Fundamental, 1998.
COIMBRA, A. S. Interdisciplinaridade e educação ambiental: integrando seus princípios necessários. Rev. Eletrônica Mestr. Educ. Ambiental, v.14, 115-121, Rio Grande, 2005a.
COIMBRA, J. A. A. Considerações sobre a Interdisciplinaridade, In : Philippi Jr., Arlindo. Interdisciplinaridade em Ciências Ambientais / A. Philippi Jr., C. E. M. Tucci, D. J. Hogan, R. Navegantes. São Paulo: Signus Editora, 2005b.
CUNHA, M. I. da. O Bom Professor e sua Prática. 5 ed. São Paulo: Papirus, 1995.
DALL’OLIO, A. J. Técnicas de Taxidermia e Osteotécnica, São Paulo, SP, LEGNAR Informática & Editora Ltda, 2002.
DELORS, J. Educação. Um tesouro a descobrir. Relatório para a Unesco da Comissão internacional sobre educação para o século XXI. 2 ed. Brasília (DF): Cortez Editora. MEC/UNESCO, 1999.
DIAS, G. F. Educação Ambiental: Princípios e Práticas. Rio de Janeiro, editora Gaia, 2004.
JONNAERT, P. Criar condições para aprender. O modelo socioconstrutivista na Civilização Brasileira, Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1985.
LEFF. E. Educação ambiental e desenvolvimento sustentável. In: REIGOTA, M. (org.) .Verde cotidiano: o meio ambiente em discussão. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A, 2001b. p. 111-129.
MORIN, E., KERN, A. B. Terra-Pátria. Porto Alegre: Editora Sulina, 1995.
MORIN. E. Os Sete Saberes Necessários à Educação do Futuro. São Paulo: Cortez,Brasília, DF:Unesco,2000.
MORGANTI. Carlos. Taxidermia, Entomologia y Herbários.Argentina: Hobby, 1952.
NICOLESCU, B. O manifesto da transdisciplinaridade. São Paulo: Triom (Centro de Estudos Marina e Martin Harvey Editorial e Comercial), 1999.
PELICIONI, M. C. F. Fundamentos da educação Ambiental, cap. 13, p. 460 - 483. In: Phillipi Jr, A., Romero, M. A., Bruna, G. C. (editores), Curso de Gestão Ambiental, Barueri, SP: Manole (Coleção Ambiental, 1), 2004.
PHILIPPI Jr., A. Interdisciplinaridade em Ciências Ambientais / A.Philippi Jr., C. E. M. Tucci, D. J. Hogan, R. Navegantes. - São Paulo:Signus Editora, 2000.
PHILIPPI Jr, A., PELICIONI, M. C. F. (editores). Educação Ambiental e Sustentabilidade – Coleção Ambiental, Barueri, SP: Manole, 2005.
PINTO. P. R. História Natural – Assistência ao Ensino . Porto Alegre: editora, 1938.
REIGOTA, Marcos. A Floresta e a Escola: por uma Educação Ambiental pós-moderna. 2ª. Edição. São Paulo: Cortez, 2002.
SICK, H. A voz Como Caráter Taxonômico em Aves. São Paulo, 1979.
SILVA, D. J. O Paradigma Transdisciplinar: uma Perspectiva Metodológica para a Pesquisa Ambiental, p. 71-94, In: Philippi Jr., A. Interdisciplinaridade em Ciências Ambientais / A. Philippi Jr., C. E. M. Tucci, D. J. Hogan, R.
Navegantes. São Paulo: Signus Editora, 2000.
TAXIDERMIA. Disponível em: www.taffareltaxidermia.com.br. Acesso em jul de 2011.
TOZONI-REIS, Marília Freitas de Campos. Educação ambiental: natureza razão e historia. Campinas, SP: Autores associados, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
