The organizational learning process in a agribusiness cooperative central
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236117020044Keywords:
Management, Knowledge, Rural, OADI-SMMAbstract
To analyzing the process of organizational learning in central agribusiness cooperative in the light of OADI-SMM model, from the perspective of the organization having cooperated as an individual, the study of construct left the following assumptions: understand the main concepts of learning organizational and OADI-SMM model; understand the peculiarities of cooperative organizations in agribusiness and its main features management; understand the process of organizational learning in central agribusiness cooperative, its main engines, agents and moments; analyzing the light of OADI-SMM model the process of learning in the unit of study and possible disruptions in organizational learning. With the interpretation of context and attention to detail and the experiences of respondents, it can be concluded in the study that, over time, the Central Cooperative has developed and strengthened continuously and endemically their organizational learning mechanisms and as a way to cope with the complexity of agribusiness, has been able to promote the exchange of knowledge acquired in adaptations to the environment. The main finding of this case study is that the Central Cooperative can promote the transfer of learning between the individual and the organizational, so we really learn.Downloads
References
ARGYRIS, C.; SCHÖN, D.A. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1978.
BASTOS, A.V.B.;GONDIM, S.M.G.;LOIOLA, E.;MENEZES, I.G.; NAVIO, V.L.R. Aprendizagem Organizacional versus Organizações que Aprendem: Características e Desafios que cercam essas duas Abordagens de Pesquisa. In ENCONTRO DE ESTUDOS
ORGANIZACIONAIS, 2., 2002, Recife. Anais... Recife: Observatório da Realidade Organizacional : PROPAD/UFPE : ANPAD, 2002. 1 CD.
CANGELOSI, V.E.; DILL, W.R.Organizational learning: observations toward a theory. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 10(2), 1965.
CHADAD, F.R. Cooperativas no agronegócio do leite: mudanças organizacionais e estratégicas em resposta à globalização. In Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, Lavras, v. 9, n. 1, p. 69-78, 2007.
CONKLIN, E. J. Capturing organizational memory. Group Decision Support Systems, 1996. Disponível em: <http://www.welchco.com/02/14/01/60/96/01/0103.HTM >. Acesso em: 24jun. 2015.
COOK, M.L. The future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: a neo-institutional approach. In American Journal of Agricultural Economics, [S.l.], v. 77, n. 5, p. 1153-1159, 1995.
CROSSAN, M.M.;LANE, H.W.;WHITE, R.E.;DJURFELDT, L.Organizational learning: dimensions for a theory. InThe International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Bowling Green, v. 3, n. 4, p. 337-360, 1995.
CYERT, R.;MARCH, J. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
DOGSON, M. Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, v. 21, n. 5, p. 375-394, 1993.
GHEMAWAT, P. Commitment: the dynamic of strategy. New York: Free Press, 1991.
HUBER,G.P. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literature. In Organization Science, 2 (2):88-115,1991.
KIM, D.H. The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review. [ ], out 1993. p. 37-50.
KIM, D.H. O elo entre a aprendizagem individual e a aprendizagem organizacional. In Klein, D. (org). A gestão estratégica do capital intelectual: recursos para a economia baseada em conhecimento. Rio de Janerio: Qualitymark, 1998.
LAUSCHNER, R. Agribusiness, cooperativa e produtor rural. 2. ed. São Leopoldo: Unisinos, 1995.
LEONARD-BARTON, D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox In managing new product development. In Strategic Management Journal, 13, p. 111-125, 1992.89.
MARCH, J.G.; OLSEN, J.P. The uncertainty of the past: organizational learning underambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, v. 3, p. 141-171, 1975.
MORAES, R. Análise de conteúdo. In Revista Educação, Porto Alegre, v. 22, n. 37, p. 7-32, 1999.
MUSETTI MUNCK, M.G.; MUNCK, L. Gestão organizacional sob a lógica da competência: aplicação na pequena empresa. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Impresso), v. 9, p. 25-39, 2008.PEDROZO, E.A. Análise de Cooperativas Agrícolas através da Utilização de Estratégias Industriais. In ANAIS - ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA ANPAD, 1993, Salvador - Bahia, Curitiba - Paraná, 27 a 29 de setembro de 1993, p.10-13.
POLÔNIO, W.A. Manual das sociedades cooperativas. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
POWELL, W.W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organizations. Research In Organizational Behavior, v.12, p.295-336, 1990.
SENGE, P. A quinta disciplina: arte e prática da organização de aprendizagem. São Paulo: Best Seller, 1990.
SIMON, H.A. Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969.
SIMON, H.A. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press, 1997.
TSANG, E.W.K. (1997). Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 59(1), 73-89.
WAACK, R.S.;MACHADO FILHO, C.P.M. Administração estratégica em cooperativas agroindustriais. In , 2, 1999, Ribeirão Preto.
YIN, R. Estudo de caso. 2ª edição. Bookman. Porto Alegre, 2004.
