Analysis of disclosure of environmental indicators of the biggest companies in the pulp and paper sector

Authors

  • Caio Assis Mady Centro Universitário - FEI
  • Fábio Assis Mady Centro Universitário - FEI
  • Felipe Nascimento Caivano Rodrigues Centro Universitário - FEI
  • Maria Tereza de Saraiva Souza Centro Universitário FEI-PPGA
  • Reny Aparecida Galvão Centro Universitário FEI - PPGA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465915944

Abstract

This study aims to compare the evidence level of environmental indicators that follow the GRI guidelines, related to the three leading companies in Brazilian pulp and paper industry, Suzano, Klabin and Fibria, in 2012. For achieving this goal, annual sustainability reports and websites of the companies studied were analyzed. The companies reported mainly those aspects related to materials, water, biodiversity and others, while products and services, compliance and energy were less emphasized. The results show that the three companies presented a low evidence level, with missing or incomplete indicators. Finally, despite the reports presented and classified as A+ and B+, it is possible to conclude that the companies did not include key indicators and presented unorganized information and lack of standardization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Caio Assis Mady, Centro Universitário - FEI

Graduando em Administração

Fábio Assis Mady, Centro Universitário - FEI

Graduando em Administração

Felipe Nascimento Caivano Rodrigues, Centro Universitário - FEI

Graduando em Administração

Maria Tereza de Saraiva Souza, Centro Universitário FEI-PPGA

Professora do PPGA da FEI

Reny Aparecida Galvão, Centro Universitário FEI - PPGA

Doutoranda em Administração - Centro Universitário FEI - PPGA

Published

2018-12-26

How to Cite

Mady, C. A., Mady, F. A., Rodrigues, F. N. C., Souza, M. T. de S., & Galvão, R. A. (2018). Analysis of disclosure of environmental indicators of the biggest companies in the pulp and paper sector. Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 11(3), 679–700. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465915944

Issue

Section

Articles