Estudo do Campo Magnético Terrestre em Função dos Diferentes Materiais Geológicos da Região de Santa Maria (RS-Brasil)

Authors

  • João Eduardo da Silva Pereira UFSM
  • Adelir José Strieder UFRGS
  • José Luiz Silvério da Silva UFSM
  • Carlos Alberto da Fonseca Pires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9813

Abstract

The present work was prepared in Santa Maria region, southernBrazil, Rio Grande do Sul State. It presents one study to evaluate thebehavior of magnetic field in function of different geologic rocks presentin the region and their spatial behavior in function of the UniversalTransverse Mercator coordinates system (UTM). With the employ ofsoftware Statistica 7.1 were analyzed the data set of original work executedby Geological Survey of Brazil/Companhia de Pesquisas de Recursos Mineraisnamed Camaquã Project. Where were tested the relationship withsedimentary formations belonged to Depressão Central do Rio Grande doSul and/or volcanic rocks belonged to Planalto da Serra Geral at ParanáBasin border and uranium concentration. The statistics estimated were:the mean, the standard error, and the trust limits for each kind of geologicalunits. In order to compare the mean values was used the Tukeys Test. Theresults were able to conclude that the Rio do Rasto Formation dont showsignificant difference only in the mean contrast with the BotucatuFormation. The means of the Depósitos Aluvionares and Grupo Rosário doSul dont show significant difference in contrast with to urban zone mean,but are different between then. The mean of Serra Geral Formation wasdifferent of the Botucatu Formation mean. Inside this context was possibleto define characteristic values from magnetic field and their trust ranges infunction to geologic units. The magnetic field when evaluated in relationto geographic coordinates using one Geographic Information Systempresented a regional gradient to north, where is located the low magneticof Earth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-06-16

How to Cite

da Silva Pereira, J. E., Strieder, A. J., Silvério da Silva, J. L., & da Fonseca Pires, C. A. (2008). Estudo do Campo Magnético Terrestre em Função dos Diferentes Materiais Geológicos da Região de Santa Maria (RS-Brasil). Ciência E Natura, 30(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9813

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 30, N. 1, 2008

Section

Geography

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.