Diagnosis of water analysis from an artesian well in the Central Region of Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X69657Keywords:
Artesian well, Potability, WaterAbstract
Water must meet some standards of potability established in the legislation, since it is a resource of utmost importance to man, when designated for human consumption can be used for ingestion, preparation and production of food, and for personal hygiene independently of the origin (BRASIL, 2011). Thus, this study aims at diagnosing the water quality from an artesian well in the Central Region of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, in order to prove the potability in relation to the potable parameters established in Portaria No. 2.914, of December 12, 2011, of Ministry of Health. For this, the experimental procedures held were: pH determination, temperature, total dissolved solids, hardness, sodium and potassium, total coliforms and residual iron concentration. After the water sample analysis, it was verified that the consumption of this sample is indicated for the population, since the parameters obtained are in accordance with Portaria Nº 2.914, of 2011.
Downloads
References
ALMEIRA, M. Geografia Global 2. São Paulo: Educational scale 2010.
BRAZIL. Health Ministery. Entrance Portaria Nº 518, march 25 of 2004. 1. ed. Brasília: Editora do Ministério da Saúde, 2005. Available on: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/portaria_518_2004.pdf. Acess on: 05 dec. 2021.
BRAZIL. Environment Ministery. CONAMA. Resoluiton nº 357, march 17, 2005. Dispose about the water bodys classification. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo, Brasília DF. Available on: http://conama.mma.gov.br/. Acess on: 05 dec. 2021
BRAZIL. Health Ministery. Entrance Portaria Nº 2.914, december 12, 2011. Dispose about the control and surveillance of the water quality for human consumption and its potability pattern. Brasília, 2011. Available on: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2011/prt2914_12_12_2011.html. Acess on: 07 dec. 2021
BRAZIL. Health Ministery. Entrance Nº 05, setember 28, 2017. [s.l.], 2017. Available on: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2017/prc0005_03_10_2017.html. Access on november 30, 2021. Acess on: 15 dec. 2021
CAMPOS, V.P.; COSTA, A. C. A.; TAVARES, T. M. Partial neutralization of rain by seaspray: the case of Recôncavo, Bahia - Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, [s.l.], v. 84, p. 204-212, 2007.
CIÊNCIA E SAÚDE. Água mineral pode ser prejudicial a hipertensos. ESTADO de MINAS, [s.l.], 2017. Tecnologia, c2022. Available on: https://www.em.com.br/app/noticia/tecnologia/2011/03/09/interna_tecnologia,214117/agua-mineral-pode-ser-prejudicial-a-hipertensos.shtml#:~:text=%22Um%20indiv%C3%ADduo%20sem%20problema%20de,fazem%20parte%20do%20nosso%20cotidiano. Access on nov. 15, 2021.
FERNANDEZ, et al. Ferro e neurodegeneração. Scientia Medica, Porto Alegre, v. 17, n. 4, p. 218-224, 2007. Disponível em: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/scientiamedica/article/view/2112/2632. Access on november 30, 2021.
FOOD Ingredients Brasil. Dossiê: os minerais na alimentação. n. 4, p. 48-65, 2008. Available on: https://revista-fi.com.br/upload_arquivos/201606/2016060908369001465586026.pdf. Access on nov. 10, 2021.
FRANCO, B. D. G. M.; LANDGRAF, M. Microbiologia dos Alimentos. São Paulo: Atheneu, 2008.
HIRATA, R. O que é um poço artesiano. Revista Super Interessante, São Paulo, 2002.
MARTINS, S. N. Águas minerais: propriedades e benefícios. 2015. Available on: http://univates.br/revistas/index.php/destaques/article/viewFile/507/499. Access on: december 05, 2021.
MEDEIROS, M. A. Ferro. Química Nova na Escola, v. 32, n. 3, p. 208-209, 2010. Available on: http://qnesc.sbq.org.br/online/qnesc32_3/11-EQ-6809.pdf. Access on: nov. 30, 2021.
PEREIRA, G. A. P.; GENARO, P. S.; PINHEIRO, M. M.; SZEJNFELD, V. L.; MARTINI, L. A. Cálcio dietético – estratégias para otimizar o consumo. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, [s.l.], v. 49, n. 2, p. 164-180, 2009.
SANTOS, A. Sódio, potássio, cloro e bicarbonato da dieta: efeitos na pressão arterial e doença cardiovascular. Revista Factores de Risco, [s.l.], n. 14, p. 44-49, 2009.
TUCCI, C. E. M; CABRAL, J. J. S. P. Prospecção tecnológica, recursos hídricos: qualidade da água. Brasília, DF: CGEE, 2003. Available on: https://www.cgee.org.br/documents/10195/734063/Livro_Recursos+H%C3%ADdricos_4647.pdf/861a3d5f-14d1-4e98-8ec3-d410df3e3d28?version=1.0. Access on: december 16, 2021.
ZHANG, Y.; WU, S. Y.; KRISHNAN, S.; WANG, K.; QUEEN, A.; ANEJA, V. P.; ARYA, S. P. Modeling agricultural air quality: current status, major challenges, and outlook. Atmospheric Environment, [s.l.], v.42, p.3218-3237, 2008.
Published
Versions
- 2022-12-06 (4)
- 2022-12-06 (3)
- 2022-09-23 (2)
- 2022-08-16 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
