Urban morphology: study and analysis of open spaces in a portion of Cachoeira do Sul (RS, Brazil)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40484Keywords:
Urban morphology, Public open spaces, Private open spacesAbstract
Urban morphology studies developed from the city configuration are important in order to enable consideration on the needs of the place we live, that is, from the city level, as in a reduced analysis, focused on the neighborhood. Thus, morphological analysis serves to subsidize the actions performed by space producers and enables reflection on the impacts generated with each new building or intervention in the urban space. The object of study of the present work is the morphological analysis of a portion of the urban fabric of a small town of Rio Grande do Sul, which is characterized by residences of the population with highest purchasing power in the city, and also by places that present irregular buildings and illegal occupations. The typological study on the urban form has its focus on the analysis of open spaces and how they dialogue with the built spaces. Maps and analyzes identify the occupation of the territory and the different types of open spaces, whether public or private, green or built. The results show how these open spaces are presented and how they are used within the study area. This work presents a methodology for mapping and identifying the quality of free spaces, which, in turn, is very important to support further analysis in other parts of the city and to understand connections and free space systems within the municipality, in order to provide to public agencies a tool that helps in the planning and qualification of the spaces, both the existing ones, as well as future new spaces.
Downloads
References
AMORIM, F. P.; TÂNGARI, V. Estudo tipológico sobre a forma urbana: conceitos e aplicações. Paisagem e Ambiente, 2006;22:61-73. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2359-5361.v0i22p61-73.
CASTELLS, M. A Questão Urbana. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra; 1983.
CAVALHEIRO, F.; PICCHIA P. C. D. Áreas verdes: conceitos, objetivos e diretrizes para o planejamento. In: Anais do I Congresso Brasileiro Sobre Arborização Urbana e 4º Encontro Nacional Sobre Arborização Urbana [Internet]; 1992, Vitória: SBAU, 1992. p. 29-38.
IBGE – INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Cachoeira do Sul. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: IBGE, 2019. Disponível em: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/rs/cachoeira-do-sul/panorama. Acesso: 1 set 2019.
LIMA, A. M. L. P.; CAVALHEIRO, F.; NUCCI, J. C.; SOUSA, M. A. L. B.; FIALHO, N. O.; PICCHIA, P. C. D. Problemas de utilização de termos como espaços livres, áreas verdes e correlatos. In: Anais do II Congresso de Arborização Urbana [Internet]; 1994, São Luís, MA: SBAU, 1994. p. 539-553.
PANERAI, P. Análise urbana. 2. ed. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília; 2006.
RITZEL, M. Templo Martim Lutero. História de Cachoeira do Sul, 2012. Disponível em: http://historiadecachoeiradosul.blogspot.com/2012/07/templo-martim-lutero.html. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2019.
ROSSI, A. A arquitetura da cidade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1995.
SCHUH, A. S.; CARLOS, I. M. S. Cachoeira do Sul, em busca de sua história. Porto Alegre: Editora Martins Livreiro, 1991.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
