Physical analysis of entry water in the agro-industry system of tannery in the city of Maringá- Paraná
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X36610Keywords:
Water, Agroindustry, Physical parametersAbstract
Assessment of water quality is extreme importance for the health of animals, especially humans. The physical paraments (electrical conductivity, pH, turbidity, apparent color, taste, smell, total solids, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids), in water indicate the quality, including that used for human consumption. Therefore, a water inspection at the entrance and exit of an agroindustrial cutting system in the city of Maringa (Brazil), between the years 2014 and 2017, is important for a relaxation of water standards. The results were published and published based on the environmental legislation showed that the quality of the water used in the agroindustry, regarding the physical parameters, respects as current environmental regulations, not causing damage to the environment and demonstrating that the process used in the agroindustrial system is efficient from an environmental standpoint.
Downloads
References
AGUAS GUARIROBAS. Qualidade da água. Disponível no endereço eletrônico: http://www.aguasguariroba.com.br/qualidade-agua/ e acessado em 31.out.2017.
AWWA - AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION. Advances in taste and odor treatment and control. Denver, AWWARF, 385p. 1995.
AWWA - AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION - [Standard Methods] 1998, 0-87553-235-7, American Water Works Association, Water Environment.
BRASIL. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução CONAMA nº 396, de 3 de abril de 2008. Diário Oficial da União. 7 abr. 2008.
BRASIL.. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria do Ministério da Saúde nº 2.914, de 12 de dezembro de 2011. Diário Oficial da União, 14 dez. 2011.
FREEZE, R.A.; CHERRY, J.A. Groundwater.N Jersey, Prentice-Hall inc., 1979, 604 p.
MAGALHÃES, A.B.S. Gosto e odor na água para consumo humano - um problema de saúde pública. 2016. Disponível no endereço eletrônico: https://www.diariodecaratinga.com.br/?p=18804 e acessado em 31.out.2017.
MANUAL TÉCNICOS PARA COLETA DE AMOSTRAS DE ÁGUA, Ministério Público de Santa Catarina. (s/d) Disponível no endereço eletrônico file:///C:/Users/admin/Downloads/livro-manual-tecnico-para-coleta-de-amostras-de-agua-mp-sc.pdf e acessado em 29.out.2017.
METCALF & EDDY, INC. Wastewater Engineering - Treatment, disposal and reuse, third edition. McGraw-Hill book Co, 1991.
ROSA FILHO, E.F.; HINDI, E.C.; MANTOVANI, L.E.; BITTENCOURT, A.V.L.As Águassubterrâneas do Estado do Paraná.Curitiba: Maxi Gráfica, 2010.
ROSA FILHO, E.F.; HINDI, E.C.; MANTOVANI, L.E.; BITTENCOURT, A.V.L. Aquíferos do Estado do Paraná. Curitiba: Maxi Gráfica, 2011.
SABESP - Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo. Norma Técnica Interna SABESP NTS 013 SÓLIDOS Método de Ensaio. São Paulo Junho - 1999 Revisão 1. 12 p.
SCHRYVER, P.D; CRAB, R.; DEFOIRDT, N.; BOON, W.The basics of bio-flocs technology: The added value for aquaculture. Aquaculture, v. 277, p. 125-137, 2008.
SILVA, A.W.; SILVA, F.F. Análise química da água de entrada no sistema agroindustrial de curtume em Maringá. REMOA, v. 17, p. 01-16, 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
