Preliminary analysis of the relationship between soil and CO2 emissions from the ecosystem in an agroecosystem in southern Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X30897Keywords:
Soil respiration. EddyCovariance. Soil chamberAbstract
The aim of this work is to perform an analysis of the CO2 relationship between nocturnal fluxes of soil and ecosystem, in na agroecossystem as atmospheric variables (soil temperature, solidity, and singleness), under the soya tillage system in southern Brazil. To calculate the fluxes, automatic soil chamber system and the EddyCovariance system were used. The preliminary analysis showed that soil moisture controls the emission of CO2 and the CO2 cumulative flux of the soil is greater than the atmosferic flow.
Downloads
References
ALMAGRO, M., LÓPEZ, J., QUEREJETA, J., MARTÍNEZ-MENA, M. (2009). Temperature dependence of soil co 2 efflux is strongly modulated by seasonal patterns of moisture availability in a mediterranean ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(3), 594-605.
BALDOCCHI, D. D., MEYERS, T.P. (1988). A spectral and lag-correlation analysis of turbulence in a deciduous forest canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 45(1), 31-58.
FANG, C., MONCRIEFF, J. B. (1999). A model for soil co 2 production and transport 1:: Model development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 95(4), 225-236.
FLANAGAN, P., VEUM, A., et al. (1974). Relationships between respiration, weight loss, temperature and moisture in organic residues on tundra. Soil organisms and decomposition in tundra, pp. 249-277.
GLISNKI, J., ST˛EPNIEWSKI, W., et al. (1985). Soil aeration and its role for plants. CRC Press, Inc..
GUNTIÑAS, M., GIL-SOTRES, F., LEIRÓS, M., TRASAR-CEPEDA, C. (2013). Sensitivity of soil respiration to moisture and temperature. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 13(2), 445-461.
LLOYD, J., TAYLOR, J. (1994). On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional ecology, pp. 315-323.
PAVELKA, M., SEDLÁK, P., ACOSTA, M., CZERNY, R., TAUFAROVÁ, K., JANOUŠ, D. (2007). Chamber techniques versus eddy covariance method during nighttime measurements. Em: International Scientific Conference, Slovakia.
REICHSTEIN, M., FALGE, E., BALDOCCHI, D., PAPALE, D., AUBINET, M., BERBIGIER, P., BERNHOFER, C., BUCHMANN, N., GILMANOV, T., GRANIER, A., et al. (2005). On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biology, 11(9), 1424-1439.
RIVEROS-IREGUI, D. A., EMANUEL, R. E., MUTH, D. J., MCGLYNN, B. L., EPSTEIN, H. E., WELSCH, D. L., PACIFIC, V. J., WRAITH, J. M. (2007). Diurnal hysteresis between soil co2 and soil temperature is controlled by soil water content. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(17), n/a–n/a, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030938, l17404.
TEICHRIEB, C. A. (2012). Trocas de carbono aatmosférico sobre dois diferentes sistemas de plantio de milho no sul do Brasil. Tese de Doutorado, UFSM.
YIQI, L., ZHOU, X. (2010). Soil respiration and the environment. Academic press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
