Modeling box - jenkins applied a prediction of wind speed in the regions of the brazilian northeast for the fins of wind generation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X29785Keywords:
Time series, ARIMA, Software RAbstract
In the present work, a study was carried out to predict monthly average wind speed in regions of the Brazilian Northeast. For this purpose, the Box - Jenkins modeling methodology was applied to the 10 m high wind speed data from January 2010 to December 2013. The forecast in all study locations was for the year 2014 through of the SARIMA model, which predominated in practically all regions, that is, an indication that the ideal forecast model must necessarily be introduced to the seasonal component. The prediction was efficient in some regions, for example, in Aracaju it was possible to find a MAPE error of 4.66%. In the localities of Aracaju and Salvador it is possible to identify that the predicted series tend to have similar behavior to the observed series regarding the similarity of maximum and minimum wind speed. This work could be used as a wind speed prediction tool to study and advance wind generation in several regions, providing decision makers with local wind exploitation, since it will be possible to estimate the wind regime in the future.
Downloads
References
AKAIKE H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York: Springer; 1998.
AQUILA G, DE OLIVEIRA PAMPLONA E, DE QUEIROZ AR, JUNIOR PR, FONSECA MN. An overview of incentive policies for the expansion of renewable energy generation in electricity power systems and the Brazilian experience. Renew. Sustain. Energy
Rev. 2017;70:1090-1098.
BOX GPE, JENKINS GM. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. 1st ed. São Francisco: Holden Day; 1978.
CADENA E, RIVERA W. Wind speed forecasting in three different regions of Mexico, using a hybrid ARIMA - ANN model. Renew. Energy 2010;35(12):2732-2738.
COCHRAN WG. Sampling techniques. 1 st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1977.
DOANE DP, SEWARD LE. Estatística aplicada à administração e econômia. 4 st ed. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill; 2014.
FAVA VL. Metodologia de Box-Jenkins para modelos univariados. In: Vasconcellos MAS, Alves D. Manual de econometria: nível intermediário. 1st ed. São Paulo: Atlas; 2000.
GOMES TLO. Utilização do Software R para Previsão de Preço do Dia Seguinte de uma Série Temporal. UNOPAR Cient. Exatas Tecnologia 2014;13(1):61-68.
GUJARATI DN. Econometria Básica. 5 st ed. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
KAVESSERI RG, SEETHARAMAN K. Day-ahead wind speed forecasting using f-ARIMA models. Renew. Energy 2009;34:1388–1393.
MARCHEZAN A, SOUZA AM. Previsão do preço dos principais grãos produzidos no Rio Grande do Sul. Ciência Rural 2010;40(11):2368-2374.
MORETTIN PA, TOLOI CMC. Análise de Séries Temporais. 2 st ed. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher; 2006.
MONTGOMERY DC, JENNINGS L, KULAHCI M. Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting. 6 st ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 2008.
PINDYCK RS, RUBINFELD DL. Microeconomia. 5 st ed. São Paulo: Prentice Hall; 2004.
R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org, 2017.
ROYSTON JB. Some techniques for assessing multivariate based on the Shapiro-Wilk W. Appl. Stat. 1983;32(2):121-133.
TROEN I, PETERSEN EL. European Wind Atlas. 1989 [cited 2017 oct 31]. In: Rise National Laboratory. Roskilde, Denmark. Available from: http://www.orbit.dtu.dk/files/112135732/European_Wind_Atlas.pdf.
WERNER L, RIBEIRO JLD. Previsão de demanda: Uma aplicação dos modelos Box-Jenkins na área de assistência técnica de computadores pessoais. Gestão & Produção 2003;10(1):47-67.
VARGAS AS, PESSANHA JF. Previsão probabilística de curto prazo da geração de energia eólica. XLVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa Operacional; 2014 setembro; Salvador;BA: 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
