Unidades de Landforms na Bacia do Arroio Cadena, Santa Maria - RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27231Abstract
This work uses the methodology proposal by Lollo (1996) to define in the basin of the stream cadena two landforms systems based on the geomorfological process, denominated as dissection and of accumulation areas. These systems were divided in smaller portions of the land, that for its time they are characterized by seven units, described in terms of morphologic features, types of you are worth, characteristic of the relief (altitude, amplitude, declivity), drainage, substratum geologic/pedological, use and occupation of the soil. We has for objective to give a contribution for the scientific knowledge of to how planning the use and occupation of the soil. Lhe analyzing data were integrated with relationship into the natural and anthropic way, identifying the main geomorphological processes.Downloads
References
LOLLO, J. A. de, O uso da técnica de avaliaaçãao do terreno no processo de elaboração do mapeamento geoténico: sistematização e aplicação na quadríccula de Campinas. Tese de Doutorado, EESC/USP, 1996, 253p.
RODRIGUES, B.B. & PEJON, O. J. A importância dos landforms na elaboração das cartas de susceptibilidade aos movimentos de massa na região de àguas de LindóialSP. In: 3° Simpósio Brasileiro de Cartografia Geotécnica, Florianópolis, 1998, CD-ROM.
ROBAINA, L. E., BERGER, M. CRISTO, S.S.V. & PAULA, P.M. de Análise dos ambientes de risco no município de Santa Maria - RS. Ciência e Natura, v.23, UFSM, 2001.in press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
