|
|
|
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Ci. e Nat., Santa Maria, v. 48, e89488, 2026
DOI: 10.5902/2179460X89488
ISSN 2179-460X
Submitted: 10/24/2024 • Approved: 11/12/2025 • Published: 04/30/2026
Biology-Ecology
Bird richness and composition post-fire in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia
Riqueza e composição de aves pós fogo na Reserva Vegetal do Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó de Uberlândia
Maria Clara Martins CampanaroI
I Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil
ABSTRACT
Fire in the Cerrado is characterized as a structuring factor in ecosystems, influencing species richness and composition. The study of birds is important in analyses of post-fire changes in the Cerrado, as fire can alter the richness and composition of bird species. In September 2021, the Vegetation Reserve of Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó was exposed to a fire, resulting in the loss of vegetation from several phytophysiognomies of the Cerrado. This study aimed to observe changes in the composition and richness of the avifauna, searching if, after one year, the community had reached stabilization compared to a previous study. To monitor this process, a fortnightly survey of the birdlife was carried out, using points and transects, in the Cerrado and Vereda phytophysiognomies. A total of 137 species, 18 orders and 41 families were registered. The bird community did not reach stabilization one year after the fire. The richness of the Cerrado consisted of 116 species while the Vereda had 118, with a similarity of 70% in their composition. Regarding the previous study, of the 179 that had already been cataloged for the Cerrado and Vereda, 48 species were not registered, such as Saltatricula atricollis, Melanopareia torquata, Cypsnagra hirundinacea, Neothraupis fasciata, which are typical of the biome and were previous residents of the research areas. More severe fires can affect bird communities, which take more than a year to be reestablished.
Keywords: Avifauna; Cerrado; Fire; Vereda
RESUMO
O fogo no Cerrado é caracterizado como um fator estruturador de ecossistemas, influenciando na riqueza e composição de espécies. O estudo das aves é importante em análises de alterações pós fogo no Cerrado, pois o fogo pode alterar a riqueza e a composição de espécies de aves. Em setembro de 2021, a Reserva Vegetal do Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó foi exposta a um incêndio, houve perda de vegetação de várias fitofisionomias de Cerrado. Este estudo objetivou verificar as alterações na composição e a riqueza da avifauna, identificando se depois de um ano, a comunidade atingiu a estabilização em comparação com um estudo anterior. Para acompanhar este processo, foi feito um levantamento quinzenal da avifauna, por meio de pontos e transectos, nas fitofisionomias cerrado e vereda. Foram registradas 137 espécies, 18 ordens e 41 famílias. A comunidade de aves não se estabilizou, um ano após a queimada. A riqueza do cerrado foi de 116 espécies, e da vereda foi de 118, com similaridade de 70% em sua composição. Em relação ao estudo anterior, das 179 que já haviam sido catalogadas para o cerrado e vereda, não foram registradas 48 espécies, como por exemplo Saltatricula atricollis, Melanopareia torquata, Cypsnagra hirundinacea, Neothraupis fasciata, que são típicas do bioma e antes eram residentes nas áreas de pesquisa. Queimadas mais severas podem afetar as comunidades de aves, de forma que estas demorem mais do que um ano para se reestabelecerem.
Palavras-chave: Avifauna; Cerrado; Fogo; Vereda
Fire is considered an environmental disturbance, as it influences the structure of environments and the composition of certain ecosystems (Coutinho, 1990; Miranda, 2010). In environments where fire is characteristic, such as in savannas, it acts to maintain habitats and biodiversity, modifying the flora and fauna, the herbaceous and shrub stratum, and the relationships between animals and plants (Mcgranahan & Wonkka, 2021). Furthermore, this maintenance relies on the level of disturbance and the frequency of fire passage. As a result, diversity can increase, remain the same, or even decrease if the disturbance is sporadic or devastating (Sousa, 2009; Meacham & McNamee, 2023).
Fire, in Cerrado environments, besides acting as an ecosystem structurer, positively and negatively influences species composition (Frizzo et al., 2011). Positively, fire can lead to an increase in environmental heterogeneity, making the habitat more diverse and, consequently, allowing new species to colonize it (Tubelis & Cavalcanti, 2000). However, it can also act negatively, generating loss of species and individuals, due to the reduction in the availability of resources, causing the displacement of animals, for example, to other areas, as well as a possible competition for space and food (Townsend, Begon & Harper, 2008).
Among the animals that are affected by fire, birds respond to this disturbance in different ways, varying with the behavior of the species, its habitat, the season of the year, and also the fire regime (Sendoda, 2009). Some species’ populations benefit from the passage of fire, increasing their abundance (Braz, 2008). Nevertheless, other species can migrate to other areas to find more resources (Tubelis & Cavalcanti, 2000). The study of birds is important in analyses of post-fire changes in the Cerrado, since their high mobility allows understanding how community dynamics work in the face of a disturbance, especially if it is caused by human action, allowing the promotion of preservation and conservation practices in essential areas for birds.
Therefore, to understand how bird composition can change over time after the sporadic passage of fire, a survey was carried out in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia (CCPIU). This area of Cerrado was exposed to a large-scale arson fire in September 2021 (Barbosa, 2021). Thus, this work aimed to analyze the current richness and composition of post-fire avifauna, in the Cerrado and Vereda areas of the CCPIU Vegetation Reserve, and compare them with the study by Malacco and contributors (2013). Furthermore, the present study aimed to answer the following questions: did fire alter the composition, richness, and return of birdlife? Did the bird community fully recover one year after the fire? Therefore, it is expected that the richness and composition of species within the two sampling environments will be similar to that registered in the previous study.
2.1 Birdlife study and sampling area
The study was carried out in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia (CCPIU) (18°58’56.65”S and 48°17’45.62”W), located in the southern part of the municipality of Uberlândia, in the state of Minas Gerais. The club has a total area of 640 hectares, of which 127 hectares are considered a Vegetation Reserve (VR) (Bacci et al., 2016). Vegetation in the VR covers phytophysiognomies of the Cerrado domain, such as Cerrado sensu stricto (ss), campo sujo, campo limpo, Veredas, and small areas of forest (Appolinario & Schiavini, 2002). The region is characterized by a humid subtropical climate, with a hot rainy period, from October to March, and a dry and cold period, from April to September (Alvares et al., 2013).
Bird sampling was conducted from October 2021 (one month after the fire) to September 2022. For bird observation, two transects were established, one in the phytophysiognomy of Cerrado sensu stricto, where there is a main trail, and the other in the phytophysiognomy of Vereda which are on average 100 meters apart (Figure 1). In each sampling area, eight observation points were delimited, equidistant at 400 meters, the first being 200 meters from the road to avoid interference. At each point, observations were made for five minutes.
Figure 1 – Sampling points in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia, referring to the 23 collections, from October 2021 to September 2022
Source: Organized by authors (2024)
In the Cerrado, birds were recorded within a radius of up to 150 meters from the observer, in addition to those flying overhead. In the Vereda, the route was carried out in the campo sujo, from which observations were directed towards the Vereda, to register species that used the campo sujo, the edge of the Vereda, the Vereda, the buritizais and the edge of the forest, since on the route there were some overlaps of Vereda, forest, and swamp (Bacci et al., 2016). Sampling was carried out directionally towards the Vereda, and not within it, as the area in question was waterlogged and difficult to access. Therefore, no species were registered in the area of the Vereda, which were behind the observer, since it was phytophysiognomy of the Cerrado sensu stricto.
A total of 23 collections were made on the Cerrado trail and 23 on the Vereda trail. Sampling in each environment was carried out in the first and second fortnight of each month, respecting a minimum interval of seven days, maximum of 21 days between one sampling and another. Sampling was carried out only in the morning, starting at 6 a.m., lasting an average of 3 hours in each research area per day, totaling 142 hours in the field.
For each point, the species found, the phytophysiognomy in which they were observed, the type of registration - visual, overflight or sound (Vielliard et al., 2010), and the registration method - visual, recording or photographic - were noted. To assist in observation, binoculars (ELEPAWL® 10x42 (98–1000m), a camera (Nikon Coolpix® P520 – SuperZoom 42X (24–1000 mm)) and a cell phone as a voice recorder were used.
Bird identification was carried out with the help of: field guides, specialized bibliographies (Malacco et al., 2013; Fieker et al., 2014; Sigrist, 2015), identification platform such as WikiAves (www.wikiaves.com.br) and eBird (www.ebird.org). To identify the species, experts in ornithology were consulted and the citizen science application BirdNET (www.birdnet.cornell.edu) was used for identifying vocalizations. Species nomenclature followed the list by Pacheco and contributors (2021).
The registered birds were classified according to their feeding guilds, as per Wilman (2014) and Motta-Júnior (1990), as carnivores, granivores, insectivores, nectarivores, frugivores and omnivores.
2.2 Comparison of species lists
For twelve years, Malacco and contributors (2013) carried out bird surveys at the CCPIU, using several methodologies, such as mist netting captures, visual observation, and sound recordings by transect, using the same areas as the current research. To complement the research, the authors also compiled data from other works carried out in the area.
This allowed a comparative analysis of the list of species already published for the research areas and the species registered in the current survey, checking whether there was a change in the composition and richness of species over time due to the passage of the fire. However, as the list by Malacco and contributors (2013) is the result of several surveys and methodologies that were carried out throughout the Club’s area, not only in the Vegetation Reserve, only those species that were recorded in the Cerrado sensu stricto and/or on the reserve Vereda were selected for analysis. In addition, species reported by Malacco et al. (2013) in areas of the CCPIU not surveyed in the present study (e.g., anthropized areas), but which were also recorded by us within the surveyed phytophysiognomies (Cerrado and/or Vereda), were retained in their list in order to enable a more precise comparison between the previous and current surveys.
Playback was used to check whether species that had not been registered, after eight months of sampling, were present in the areas where they had been registered in the previous study. Only the vocalizations of birds of the order Passeriformes were emitted, corresponding to the habitat in which they were previously registered (Cerrado or Vereda). To emit the sounds, a portable speaker was used. The corresponding vocalizations were selected from the sound database of the WikiAves and eBird applications, preferably the chirps that had less external interference, and that were recorded as close as possible to the sampling location. The ethical parameters of bird watchers were followed (ICMBIO, 2021).
2.3 Data analysis
In an attempt to maximize the registering potential, biweekly samplings were grouped into monthly samplings, thus data analyses were carried out with monthly data.
To check the sampling effort and whether the bird community had stabilized, species accumulation and rarefaction curves (95% confidence interval) were generated using the Chao 2 richness estimator (Rodrigues, 2019) for both the general richness of species, as well as richness in each sampled environment. These curves were generated from a presence and absence matrix using the ‘vegan’ package in the R software (Oksanen et al., 2022; R Core Development Team, 2023).
To compare the similarity in species composition between sampling environments, the Jaccard Similarity Index (Sj) was calculated, which uses the presence and absence of species to compose the calculation. The index corresponds to:
where:
a = is the number of species in common in both areas;
b and c = total number of species exclusive to each area
To find out if there was a difference in the monthly species richness in the Cerrado and Vereda and between the dry and rainy seasons, a t-test was carried out. The increase in richness between the first month of collections (October/2021) and the last month of sampling (September/2022) in each environment was presented as a percentage.
To identify whether there was overlap in species composition before and after the fire, the Jaccard index was calculated between these periods. For this purpose, presence/absence data obtained from filtering the list by Malacco et al. (2013) and the list of species obtained in the current survey were used.
To graphically illustrate the overlap of species between the pre- and post-fire periods, a Venn diagram was created. The diagram shows the number of species exclusive to each period and those shared between both, based on the presence/absence matrix. This visual representation was used to aid in the interpretation of compositional similarity, complementing the value of the Jaccard index obtained.
Statistical analyses were carried out in R, version 4.2.2 (R CORE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, 2023). To verify the homogeneity of variance and normality of data, the Levene test and the Shapiro-Wilk test were used, respectively. For the graphs built in R, the ‘sciplot’ (Morales et al., 2020), and ‘ggplot2’ (Wickham, 2016) packages were used. Microsoft Excel 356 (version 2304) was also used to create other graphs and tables.
3.1 Species richness and composition
A total of 137 species (Table 1), distributed in 18 orders and 41 families, were registered. The most diverse order was Passeriformes with 76 species, followed by Apodiformes with 11 species, corresponding to 55.4 and 8% of all records, respectively.
Table 1 – List of species registered in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia, from October 2021 to September 2022, according to the taxonomic classification of Pacheco et al. (2021)
|
Species |
Feeding guilds |
Registration location |
|
Tinamiformes (2) |
||
|
Tinamidae (2) |
||
|
Crypturellus parvirostris |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Rhynchotus rufescens |
Omnivore |
Ver |
|
Anseriformes (2) |
||
|
Anatidae (2) |
||
|
Cairina moschata |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Amazonetta brasiliensis |
Omnivore |
Cer |
|
Galliformes (1) |
||
|
Cracidae (1) |
||
|
Penelope superciliaris |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Columbiformes (6) |
||
|
Columbidae (6) |
||
|
Patagioenas cayennensis |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Patagioenas picazuro |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Leptotila verreauxi |
Granivore |
Ver |
|
Zenaida auriculata |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Columbina squammata |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Columbina talpacoti |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Cuculiformes (3) |
||
|
Cuculidae (3) |
||
|
Guira guira |
Carnivore |
Cer |
|
Crotophaga ani |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Tapera naevia |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Caprimulgiformes (3) |
||
|
Caprimulgidae (3) |
||
|
Nyctidromus albicollis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Hydropsalis maculicaudus |
Insectivore |
Ver |
|
Hydropsalis torquata |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Apodiformes (11) |
||
|
Apodidae (2) |
||
|
Streptoprocne zonaris* |
Insectivore |
Ver |
|
Tachornis squamata* |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Trochilidae (9) |
||
|
Phaethornis pretrei |
Nectarivore |
Ver |
|
Colibri serrirostris |
Nectarivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Heliomaster squamosus |
Nectarivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Heliomaster furcifer |
Nectarivore |
Ver |
|
Calliphlox amethystina |
Nectarivore |
Ver |
|
Chlorostilbon lucidus |
Nectarivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Eupetomena macroura |
Nectarivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Chrysuronia versicolor |
Nectarivore |
Cer |
|
Chionomesa fimbriata |
Nectarivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Gruiformes (2) |
||
|
Rallidae (2) |
||
|
Mustelirallus albicolis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Pardirallus nigricans |
Insectivore |
Ver |
|
Charadriiformes (1) |
||
|
Charadriidae (1) |
||
|
Vanellus chilensis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Pelecaniformes (4) |
||
|
Ardeidae (2) |
||
|
Ardea alba* |
Carnivore |
Ver |
|
Syrigma sibilatrix |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Threskiornithidae (2) |
||
|
Mesembrinibis cayennensis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Theristicus caudatus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Cathartiformes (1) |
||
|
Cathartidae (1) |
||
|
Coragyps atratus |
Carnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Accipitriformes (3) |
||
|
Accipitridae (3) |
||
|
Heterospizias meridionalis |
Carnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Rupornis magnirostris |
Carnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Geranoaetus albicaudatus* |
Carnivore |
Ver |
|
Galbuliformes (2) |
||
|
Galbulidae (1) |
||
|
Galbula ruficauda |
Insectivore |
Ver |
|
Bucconidae (1) |
||
|
Nystalus maculatus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Piciformes (7) |
||
|
Ramphastidae (1) |
||
|
Ramphastos toco |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Picidae (6) |
||
|
Picumnus albosquamatus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Melanerpes candidus |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Veniliornis passerinus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Campephilus melanoleucos |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Dryocopus lineatus |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Colaptes melanochloros |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Cariamiformes (1) |
||
|
Cariamidae (1) |
||
|
Cariama cristata |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Falconiformes (4) |
||
|
Falconidae (4) |
||
|
Herpetotheres cachinnans |
Carnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Caracara plancus |
Carnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Falco sparverius |
Insectivore |
Ver |
|
Falco femoralis |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Psittaciformes (8) |
||
|
Psittacidae (8) |
||
|
Brotogeris chiriri* |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Alipiopsitta xanthops |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Amazona aestiva |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Eupsittula aurea |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Orthopsittaca manilatus* |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Ara ararauna* |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Diopsittaca nobilis |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Psittacara leucophthalmus* |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Passeriformes (76) |
||
|
Thamnophilidae (4) |
||
|
Formicivora rufa |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Herpsilochmus longirostris |
Insectivore |
Ver |
|
Thamnophilus doliatus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Thamnophilus torquatus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Dendrocolaptidae (1) |
||
|
Lepidocolaptes angustirostris |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Furnariidae (4) |
||
|
Furnarius rufus |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Phacellodomus ruber |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Synallaxis albescens |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Synallaxis frontalis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Tityridae (1) |
||
|
Pachyramphus polychopterus |
Omnivore |
Cer |
|
Rhynchocyclidae (2) |
||
|
Todirostrum cinereum |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Hemitriccus margaritaceiventer |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Tyrannidae (24) |
||
|
Camptostoma obsoletum |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Elaenia flavogaster |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Elaenia cristata |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Elaenia chiriquensis |
Omnivore |
Cer |
|
Elaenia obscura |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Suiriri suiriri |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Phaeomyias murina |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Serpophaga subcristata |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Myiarchus swainsoni |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Myiarchus ferox |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Myiarchus tyrannulus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Pitangus sulphuratus |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Machetornis rixosa |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Megarynchus pitangua |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Tyrannus albogularis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Tyrannus melancholicus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Tyrannus savana |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Griseotyrannus aurantioatrocristatus |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Empidonomus varius |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Pyrocephalus rubinus |
Insectivore |
Ver |
|
Gubernetes yetapa |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Myiophobus fasciatus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Xolmis velatus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Nengetus cinereus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Vireonidae (1) |
||
|
Cyclarhis gujanensis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Corvidae (1) |
||
|
Cyanocorax cristatellus |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Hirundinidae (4) |
||
|
Pygochelidon cyanoleuca* |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Stelgidopteryx ruficollis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Progne chalybea |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Hirundo rustica* |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Troglodytidae (2) |
||
|
Troglodytes musculus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Cantorchilus leucotis |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Polioptilidae (1) |
||
|
Polioptila dumicola |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Turdidae (3) |
||
|
Turdus leucomelas |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Turdus rufiventris |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Turdus amaurochalinus |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Mimidae (1) |
||
|
Mimus saturninus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Fringillidae (1) |
||
|
Euphonia chlorotica |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Passerellidae (2) |
||
|
Ammodramus humeralis |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Zonotrichia capensis |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Icteridae (3) |
||
|
Icterus pyrrhopterus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Gnorimopsar chopi |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Pseudoleistes guirahuro |
Omnivore |
Ver |
|
Parulidae (3) |
||
|
Geothlypis aequinoctialis |
Insectivore |
Ver |
|
Myiothlypis leucophrys |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Myiothlypis flaveola |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Cardinalidae (1) |
||
|
Cyanoloxia brissonii |
Frugivore |
Ver |
|
Thraupidae (17) |
||
|
Nemosia pileata |
Insectivore |
Cer |
|
Emberizoides herbicola |
Omnivore |
Ver |
|
Dacnis cayana |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Saltator maximus |
Insectivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Saltator similis |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Coereba flaveola |
Nectarivore |
Cer |
|
Volatinia jacarina |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Coryphospingus cucullatus |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Sporophila plúmbea |
Granivore |
Ver |
|
Sporophila nigricollis |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Sporophila caerulescens |
Granivore |
Ver |
|
Sporophila leucoptera |
Granivore |
Ver |
|
Sicalis flaveola |
Granivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Schistochlamys ruficapillus |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Thraupis sayaca |
Omnivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Thraupis palmarum |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
|
Stilpnia cayana |
Frugivore |
Cer, Ver |
Source: Organized by the authors (2023)Legend: Feeding guilds = Wilman et al. (2014) and Motta-Júnior (1990); Registration location: Cer = Cerrado; Ver = Vereda; * = flight registration
Among the registered families, the one with the greatest richness was Tyrannidae with 24 species, which corresponds to 17.5% of the total records in this study, followed by Thraupidae (17) with 12.4%, Trochilidae (9) with 6, 5%, Psittacidae (8) with 5.8%.
The species accumulation curve (Figure 2) depicts richness over the months. The observed richness represented 91.33% (150 species) of the expected number of species, according to the estimator Chao 2 (Figure 2).
Figure 2 – Monthly accumulation curve of species registered in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia, from October 2021 to September 2022
Source: Authors (2023). Legend: Solid black line refers to the observed richness and the dashed gray line refers to the expected richness by the Chao2 index
Among the 137 species sampled in this study, 27 species were registered in all sampling months and 20 were registered only once. When analyzing each area (Vereda and Cerrado sensu stricto) separately, the species accumulation curve maintained a similar pattern of species discovery (Figure 3). In the Cerrado, 116 species were registered, 19 of which were observed only in the Cerrado; in the Vereda, 118 species, of which 21 were seen only in the Vereda (Table 1).
Figure 3 – Accumulation curve of species, according to the environment Cerrado (red line) and Vereda (green line), of birds registered in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia, from October 2021 to September 2022
Source: Authors (2023)
On average, the Cerrado and the Vereda had similar monthly richness, 58.8 ± 8.0 and 57.4 ± 8.9, respectively, with no significant difference between the months (t21 = 0.407, p = 0.68) (Table 2). The similarity index (Sj) between the Cerrado and the Vereda was 70%. However, there is the possibility of registering more species in the Vereda than in the Cerrado, since the estimator Chao 2 showed the probability of finding 123 species in the Cerrado and 147 in the Vereda, if more samplings were carried out.
Table 2 – Monthly species richness in each environment, Cerrado and Vereda and in each season, rainy and dry
|
Sample months |
Season |
Cerrado |
Vereda |
|
October/2021 |
Rainy |
56 |
54 |
|
November/2021 |
Rainy |
64 |
59 |
|
December/2021 |
Rainy |
62 |
36 |
|
January/2022 |
Rainy |
54 |
60 |
|
February/2022 |
Rainy |
48 |
49 |
|
March/2022 |
Rainy |
57 |
55 |
|
April/2022 |
Dry |
54 |
65 |
|
May/2022 |
Dry |
64 |
61 |
|
June/2022 |
Dry |
54 |
54 |
|
July/2022 |
Dry |
53 |
59 |
|
August/2022 |
Dry |
61 |
68 |
|
September/2022 |
Dry |
79 |
69 |
Source: Organized by the authors (2023)
The monthly richness in the Cerrado immediately after the fire (October/2021=56) represented 70.9% of that found after one year of sampling (September/2022=79) (Table 2). For the Vereda, this value was 78%. The species composition between October/2021 and September/2022 in the Cerrado showed a similarity of 52%, while in the Vereda the similarity was 54%.
The total species richness in the rainy season was 115 and in the dry season 120. The similarity in species composition between the two seasons was 72%. The total richness in each season in the Cerrado was equal (n=102), however the similarity was 75% between the seasons. There was also no difference in the monthly richness of species in the Cerrado between the seasons (t8 = -0.853; p = 0.41; Figure 4A). In the Vereda, during the rainy season, a total of 95 species was registered, and in the dry season there were 106, with a similarity in species composition of 69%. Furthermore, there was a difference in the monthly species richness in the Vereda between the rainy and dry seasons (t8 = -2.438; p = 0.03; Figure 4B).
Figure 4 – Differences in average monthly richness between the rainy (blue line) and dry (yellow line) seasons, in the two collection areas, Cerrado (A) and Vereda (B), of birds sampled in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia, October 2021 to September 2022. The dots represent the means and the bars correspond to the standard deviation
Source: Authors (2023)
In the current survey, 6 new species were registered in relation to the study by Malacco and contributors (2013). Of these, two were registered both in the Cerrado and in the Vereda, Serpophaga subcristata and Myiothlypis flaveola; one only in the Cerrado, Chrysuronia versicolor; and three only on the Vereda, Hydropsalis maculicaudus, Heliomaster furcifer, and Cyanoloxia brissonii.
Of the six categories of feeding guilds, the one with the greatest richness was the Insectivores, with 66 species, followed by the Omnivores with 25 species, Frugivores with 15, Granivores with 13 species, Nectarivores with 10 species, and Carnivores with 8 species.
3.2 Lists comparative analysis
In the survey conducted by Malacco et al. (2013) at CCPIU, a total of 202 bird species were recorded, of which 170 occurred in the Cerrado (n = 141) and/or in the Vereda (n = 127). In the present study, nine species were recorded that had previously been reported by Malacco et al. (2013) in other areas of the CCPIU (e.g., anthropized habitats), but not specifically in the Cerrado or Vereda. Since these species were found within these two phytophysiognomies in our survey, they were included in the comparative list, resulting in 179 species considered for comparison (170 + 9). Of these, 131 were also recorded in the present study. In addition, we report six species that are new records for the CCPIU as a whole, thereby expanding the total number of species known for the area.
Of the species sampled by Malacco and contributors (2013) in the study areas, 48 species were not registered (Figure 5), which corresponds to 26.8% of the records, of which 12 had been registered in both environments, 23 in the Cerrado, and 13 in the Vereda. Of the unregistered species, eight are from the Thraupidae family, six from the Tyrannidae family, and five from the Accipitridae family.
The Jaccard index between the pre and post-fire periods was 70%, indicating high overlap in species composition based on species presence/absence.
Figure 5 – Overlap of species composition before and after the fire in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia, using a Venn diagram
Source: Authors (2025). Legend: Pink: number of species recorded just before the burn; Light brown: number of species recorded from the current survey; Green: new species for the areas
In studies describing how fire influences the richness and composition of communities, two areas with similar vegetation structure are generally compared simultaneously, of which one was affected by fire and the other was not (Cavalcanti & Alves, 1997; Cintra & Sanaiotti, 2005; Braz, 2008; Sendoda, 2009; Woinarski & Legge, 2013). However, due to the severity and unpredictability of the fire that occurred in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca, it was not possible to carry out this simultaneous comparison between the burned and unburned area, as the VR had several of its phytophysiognomies completely burned, with the exception of gallery forest areas. For this reason, data published by Malacco et al. (2013) were used for comparison. As the previous research was only carried out at times when the fire had not passed through the area, it was assumed that the data from this research demonstrate a stabilized community, despite this being work based on various collection methodologies.
Based on the current survey, we investigated how the fire affected the composition and richness of bird species in the Vegetation Reserve. After a year of sampling, it was found that the bird community had not yet stabilized, because, although the richness estimators showed a small percentage of the possibility of new records, when compared to the richness recorded in the previously sampled areas, more species were expected to be found.
In a study carried out by Braz (2008), in open areas of Cerrado, it was observed that the return of birds to recently burned areas showed a brief decrease in richness immediately after the fire, but after the first rains, the birdlife returned, stabilizing until the end of 20 months of sampling. Therefore, as in the aforementioned study, it is possible that the community sampled in the current survey takes longer to stabilize. Furthermore, the severity of the fire may have contributed to the non-stabilization of bird richness over the months of sampling.
The richness sampled in each collection environment was similar, showing high similarity. This also occurred in the research of Bagno and Marinho-Filho (2001). The authors found a similarity of 71% between the Cerrado and the Vereda. They explained that these areas allow the presence of forest, grassland, and aquatic birds, in the case of Veredas, as it is a transitional zone between forests and fields.
This work also showed that more species could be registered, mainly in the Vereda, due to the connection with areas of gallery forests, marshes, and streams, which would allow for a greater richness of species (Bagno & Marinho-Filho, 2001). However, the richness in the Vereda was lower in the rainy season, probably due to the fire occurring shortly before the start of this season. According to Woinarski and Legge (2013), the passage of fire at the beginning of the rainy season could reduce species richness, as most Cerrado birds concentrate their reproduction during this period (Sick, 1997). October may also have had its richness reduced by the fire to the point of resembling the last month of drought, which is September. The similarity of 52% between these months in the Cerrado and 54% in the Vereda highlights the change in species composition over the months of sampling.
Changes in composition over the months were observed through the movement of species between areas and the high number of species not registered after the fire compared to the study by Mallaco and contributors (2013). Humid areas, of Veredas and forests, for example, possibly became a refuge for birds of open areas, from where they moved to these areas in search for resources, after the fire (Cavalcanti, 1992; Bagno & Marinho-Filho, 2001; Robinson et al., 2013). Therefore, the hypothesis of this work was not corroborated, as the richness was not reestablished one year after the fire, and the composition showed differences due to non-registration of some species and the registration of new species, in relation to the previous study.
This displacement was observed based on registries of vocalizations of the tinamidae Crypturellus parvirostris and Rhynchotus rufescens and rallidae Mustelirallus albicollis and Pardirallus nigricans, in forest edge and interior areas, as in the previous survey they had been registered in open areas of Cerrado and Vereda. Furthermore, Reis (2015) reported that the abundance of the species R. rufescens in the Cerrado increased over ten months after the fire, but in the current survey, the species was recorded only once in the Vereda, ten months after the fire.
As the sampling area is close to the river Uberabinha and a lake that is inside the Club, during the fire, water birds, such as Ardea alba and Cairina moschata may have moved and taken refuge in these adjacent areas, not being directly affected by the fire, since they were seen flying over and in the area of the Vereda, in the case of C. moschata (Arantes & Melo, 2011; Mcgranahan & Wonkka, 2021). They could also have traveled in search for places with greater availability of resources, as in the case of A. alba (Sick, 1997).
Forest birds may also have moved to recently burned areas in search for food (Cavalcanti, 1992). In this work, the species Galbula ruficauda, Herpsilochmus longirostris, Myiothlypis leucophrys, and Myiothlypis flaveola, which are forestry, were registered both on the edges of forests, edges of Vereda and in the Cerrado, as in the case of M. flaveola. According to Cavalcanti (1992), bird species can use recently burned areas opportunistically, especially insectivorous ones. After a fire event, birds explore the exposed soil in search for insects that were previously buried (Lopes & Vasconcelos, 2011). Moreover, after the first rains, herbivorous insects take advantage of the regrowth to feed themselves and reproduce, becoming an abundant food resource for insectivorous and omnivorous birds (Cintra & Sanaiotti, 2005).
In the Vereda, species that had not been registered by Malacco et al. (2013) or that were also registered by the authors, but in other areas of the club, such as Chrysuronia versicolor, Heliomaster furcifer, Cyanoloxia brissonii, Pyrocephalus rubinus were observed. This possibly occurred due to the presence of greater availability of resources in the dry season in the Vereda, time when such species were registered.
Birds of prey, such as Falco femoralis and Geranoaetus albicaudatus seek recently burned areas in search for food resources (Reis, 2015). G. albicaudatus, for example, was registered only once, shortly after the fire. The other raptor species registered in this study maintained their presence in the observation areas throughout the research.
The presence of raptors shortly after a fire event has also been observed by other authors, such as Woinarski (1990), Reis (2015), McGranahan, and Wonkka (2021). These birds are seen hunting animals that flee fire, or even carcasses. However, of the 19 raptor species registered by Malacco et al. (2013) only nine were registered in the current survey, considering the species Coragyps atratus. One of the missing species was Urubinga coronata, a bird of prey that is rare in the region and which is threatened with extinction due to habitat loss (ICMBIO, 2018).
In the survey by Malacco et al. (2013). nine nocturnal species were registered, two of which were seen in the current survey, Nyctidromus albicollis and Hydropsalis torquata. Although this study did not include nocturnal sampling, these species were registered because they have a crepuscular habit, being active until moments before dawn (Kilpp & Prestes, 2013). In addition, a new species for the area was registered, Hydropsalis maculicaudus, minutes before sunrise, and only in the first sampling in the marsh areas of the Vereda, possibly looking for insects close to the ground.
The endemic species of the Cerrado biome, Melanopareia torquata, Saltatricula atricollis, and other residents of the reserve, such as Cypsnagra hirundinacea, Neothraupis fasciata, Schistochlamys melanopis, Sporophila collaris, were not registered in the current survey (Lima-Silva, 2009; Almeida, 2009; Arantes & Melo, 2011; Malacco et al., 2013).
The species S. collaris was not seen, possibly because it is a migratory species, which was generally seen in the dry season, and which has a habitat requirement related to some grass species (Lima-Silva, 2009; Malacco et al., 2013). Therefore, its registration would depend on the availability of resources in the dry season, which may not have been sufficient.
The species Saltatricula atricollis was commonly seen in the Cerrado and the Vereda by Almeida (2009) and Arantes and Melo (2011), presenting greater abundance in the rainy period, in December and January, when there were more food resources, and at the beginning of the dry period, due to high seed availability. However, the fire may have interfered with the quality of the habitat for this species, as well as for M. torquata, C. hirundinacea, N. fasciata and S. melanopis, which are generally found in open Cerrado areas and are highly sensitive to disturbances (Cavalcanti & Alves, 1997; Tubelis & Cavalcanti, 2000; Sendoda, 2009), with the exception of S. melanopis, which is registered in veredas and forests (Tubelis, 2009).
Besides the fire, the fact that 48 bird species were not registered can be attributed to the sampling time, as the previous study referred to a compilation of eleven years of sampling using several methodologies. Even though the birds may have taken refuge in adjacent areas, such as forests, currently the reserve is surrounded by monocultures, as well as a subdivision under construction; therefore, over the years, the reserve may become more isolated, enhancing a reduction of species diversity.
Another factor that may have contributed to the failure to register more species is that at the time the previous study was carried out, there was no highway present in the back of the reserve; instead, there was only a dirt road, thus the vegetation cover around the reserve was larger, which contributed to the diversity of species. The continuous use of parts of the reserve as cycling trails, and the proximity to the highway, may also have led to a possible disturbance and consequently scared birds away. However, further studies are required that prove a possible loss of species, due to the expansion of agriculture and construction, very close to the reserve.
More severe and infrequent fires, such as the one that occurred in the Vegetation Reserve, altered the bird community in such a way that the richness did not stabilize and the species composition changed, as there were unregistered bird species that did not resemble the registered ones of the previous study. Therefore, it is clear that the effects of fire on birdlife are severe and long-lasting, potentially altering the return of species, or even modifying richness and composition.
The authors would like to thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel Foundation (CAPES) and the Federal University of Uberlândia for supporting the development of this research. They also thank the members of the Ornithology and Bioacoustics Laboratory at the Federal University of Uberlândia for their help with field trips.
Almeida, C. G. (2009). Variação populacional e comportamento alimentar de Mimus saturninus (Lichtenstein 1823) Polioptila dumicola (Vieillot 1817) e Saltator atricollis (Vieillot 1817). (Mestrado). Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 2009. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/13312.
Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., de Moraes Gonçalves, J. L., & Sparovek, G. (2013). Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
Appolinario, V., & Schiavini I. (2002). Levantamento fitossociológico de espécies arbóreas de cerrado (stricto sensu) em Uberlândia - Minas Gerais. Boletim do Herbário Ezechias Paulo Heringer, 10, 57-75.
Arantes, C. A., & Melo, C. (2011). Reprodução e conservação de aves na vereda do clube caça e Pesca Itororó em Uberlândia/MG. Revista Horizonte Científico, 5(2). Retrieved from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/horizontecientifico/article/view/11720.
Bacci, L. F., Versiane, A. F. A., Oliveira, A. L. F., & Romero, R. (2016). Melastomataceae na RPPN do Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil. Hoehnea, 43(4), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-27/2016
Bagno, M. A., & Marinho-Filho, J. (2001). A avifauna do Distrito Federal: uso de ambientes abertos e florestais e ameaças. In: Ribeiro, J.F. Cerrado: caracterização e recuperação de matas de galeria. Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina. (pp. 495-528).
Barbosa, L. (2021). Incêndio destrói quase 600 hectares de reserva no Clube Caça e Pesca. Diário de Uberlândia. Retrieved from: https://diariodeuberlandia.com.br/noticia/29364/incendio-destroi-quase-600-hectares-de-reserva-no-clube-caca-e-pesca.
Braz, V. S. (2008). Ecologia e conservação das aves campestres do bioma Cerrado. (Thesis). Instituto de Ciências Biológicas da Universidade de Brasília, 2008. Retrieved from: http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/3572.
Cavalcanti, R. B. (1992). The importance of forest edges in the ecology of open country cerrado birds. In: Furley, P.A. Nature and dynamics of forest-savanna boundaries. (pp. 513-518). Chapman & Hall, London.
Cavalcanti, R. B., & Alves, M. A. S. (1997). Effects of fire on savanna birds in Central Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical, 8, 85-87. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/ornitologia_neotropical/vol8/iss1/15.
Cintra, R., & Sanaiotti, T. M. (2005). Fire effects on the composition of a bird community in an Amazonian Savanna (Brazil). Braz. J. Biol., 65(4), 683-695. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842005000400016.
Coutinho, L. M. (1990). Fire in the Ecology of the Brazilian Cerrado. In: Goldammer, J. G. Fire in the Tropical Biota (pp. 82-105). Ecological Studies, Springer, Berlin. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75395-4_6.
Fieker, C. Z., Reis, M. G., & Bruno, S. F. (2014). Guia de bolso: 100 aves do Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra – MG. São Roque de Minas. ICMBio.
Frizzo, T. L. M., Bonizario, C., Borges, M. P., & Vasconcelos, H. (2011). Revisão dos efeitos do fogo sobre a fauna de Formações Savânicas do Brasil. Oecologia Australis, 15(2), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2011.1502.13.
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, ICMBIO. (2018). Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção. Brasília: ICMBio.
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, ICMBIO. (2021). Código de ética do observador de aves. CEMAVE: ICMBio.
Kilpp, J. C., & Prestes, N. P. (2013). Aspectos comportamentais de espécies da família Caprimulgidae na Estação Ecológica de Aracuri, Rio Grande do Sul. Ornithologia, 5(2), 108-114. Retrieved from: http://ornithologia.cemave.gov.br/index.php/ornithologia/issue/view/10.
Lima-Silva, D. B. (2009). Caracterização de nicho de Sporophila spp. (Aves: Emberizidae) e sua relação com a estrutura de microhabitats em áreas de vereda de Uberlândia, MG. (Mestrado) Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 2009. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/13330
Lopes, C. T., & Vasconcelos, H. (2011). Fire Increases Insect Herbivory in a Neotropical Savanna. Biotropica, 43(5), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00757.x.
Malacco, G.B., Pioli, D., Junior Silva, E. L., Franchin, A. G., Melo, C., Silva, A. M., & Pedroni, F. (2013). Avifauna da Reserva do Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó de Uberlândia. Atualidades Ornitológicas On-line, 174, 40-53. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264934708_Avifauna_da_reserva_do_Clube_de_Caca_e_Pesca_Itororo_de_Uberlandia.
Mcgranahan, A. D., & Wonkka, C. L. (2021). Ecology of Fire-Dependent Ecosystems Wildland: Fire Science, Policy, and Management. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429487095.
Miranda, H. S. (2010). Efeitos do regime de fogo sobre a estrutura de comunidades de Cerrado: Projeto Fogo. Brasília: Ibama.
Meacham, B. J., &Mcnamee, M. (2023). Handbook of Fire and the Environment: Impacts and Mitigation. Springer Nature Switzerland. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94356-1.
Morales, M. et al. (2020). _sciplot: Scientific Graphing Functions for Factorial Designs_. R package version 1.2-0. Retrieved from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sciplot.
Motta-Júnior, J. C. (1990). Estrutura trófica e composição das avifaunas de três habitats terrestres na região central do estado de São Paulo. Ararajuba. 1, 65-71.
Oksanen, J. et al. (2022). _vegan: Community Ecology Package_. R package version 2.6-4, Retrieved from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
Pacheco, J.F. et al. (2021). Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee – second edition. Ornithology Research, 29(2), 1-123. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x.
R Core Development Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Áustria. Retrieved from: https://www.R-project.org/.
Reis, M.G. 2015. Efeitos do fogo sobre a assembleia de aves de Cerrado. (Thesis). Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2015. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/7355.
Robinson, N. M., Leonard, S. W. J., Ritchie, E. G., Bassett, M., Chia, E. K., Buckingham, S., Gibb, H., Bennett, A. F., & Clarke, M. F. (2013). Review: Refuges for fauna in fire-prone landscapes: Their ecological function and importance. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 1321-1329. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12153.
Rodrigues, V. B. (2019). Análises de Diversidade Biológica com o R. Online. Retrieved from: https://zenodo.org/record/3417842#.ZGJ7W3bMLrc.
Sendoda, A. M. C. (2009). Efeitos do manejo do fogo sobre comunidades de aves em campos sujos no Parque Nacional das Emas (GO/MS), Cerrado central. (Mestrado). Universidade de São Paulo. Retrieved from: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/41/41134/tde-05042010-132002/publico/Sendoda.pdf.
Sick, H. (1997). Ornitologia Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira.
Sigrist, T. (2015). Aves do Brasil Oriental – Guia de Bolso. São Paulo: Avis Brasilis.
Sousa, N. M. (2009). Influência do Histórico de fogo sobre a ornitofauna do Parque Nacional das Emas (GO/MS). (Mestrado). Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, 2009. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/596
Townsend, C. R., Begon, M. & Harper, J. L. (2008). Fundamentos em Ecologia. 3 ed. Porto Alegre, Artmed.
Tubelis, D. P. (2009). Veredas and their use by birds in the Cerrado, South America: a review. Biota Neotrop, 9(3), 363-374. Retrieved from: https://www.scielo.br/j/bn/a/6x3t4VZqScLV3GkFKFNJBNt/#.
Tubelis, D.P., & Cavalcanti, R.B. (2000). A comparison of bird communities in natural and disturbed non-wetland open habitats in the Cerrado’s central region, Brazil. Bird Conservation International, 10, 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270900000290.
Vielliard, J. M. E., Almeida, M. E. C., Anjos, L., & Silva, W. (2010). Levantamento quantitativo por pontos de escuta e o Índice Pontual de Abundância (IPA). In: MATTER, S.V. et al. Ornitologia e Conservação: Ciência Aplicada, Técnicas de Pesquisa e Levantamento (pp. 47-60). Rio de Janeiro: Technical Books Editora.
Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. New York. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3.
Wilman, H. et al. (2014). Elton-Traits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology, 95(7), 2027. Retrieved from: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/13-1917.1.
Woinarski, J., & Legge, S. (2013). The impacts of fire on birds in Australia’s tropical savannas. Emu, 113(4), 319-352. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1071/MU12109.
Authorship contributions
1 – Maria Clara Martins Campanaro
Master’s degree in Ecology and Conservation of Natural Resources from the Federal University of Uberlândia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8457-9552 • mccampanaro@hotmail.com
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Software, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
2 – Celine de Melo
PhD in Ecology from the University of Brasília
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-8314 • celinemelo@gmail.com
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, SupervisionWriting - original draft, Writing - review & editing
How to quote this article
Campanaro, M. C. M., & Melo, C. (2026). Bird richness and composition post-fire in the Vegetation Reserve of the Clube Caça e Pesca Itororó in Uberlândia. Ciencia e Natura, 48, e89488. DOI: 10.5902/2179460X89488. Available in: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X89488